Join the best erotica focused adult social network now
Login
voyager
Over 90 days ago
Straight Male, 50
0 miles · Vienna

Forum

Quote by seeker4
The singularity is imminent. We will produce an intelligence the exceeds our own which will proceed to take over control of our world. In fact, it may already have happened...


... I said too much...





More seriously, even a self-driving car is a step in that direction, but does not qualify as "intelligent" in a human sense. Ditto Watson (the Jeopardy-playing supercomputer that is now being more gainfully employed in medical and other research tasks). They still aren't capable of truly independent, creative thought but are slaves to very complex algorithms. Watson, for instance, only seems smart because it can search huge fucking databases extremely quickly to come up with an answer. Ditto Siri/Cortana/Google Voice. What we are seeing is programmers taking advantage of massive increases in processing and storage power enabled by networking large numbers of computers together to create "smarter" applications with extremely complex algorithms and some learning ability (ie. they can create their own algorithms on the fly) but they still don't match up to human intelligence and won't for some time to come. Quantum computing might eventually let us come closer to human-like intelligence but it's still in its infancy.

So no need to start fearing Skynet yet, but scientists and ethicists are starting to debate and discuss the ramifications of smarter, more human-like machine intelligences. Hopefully, that debate can keep pace with the technology.



Yes ,what we are looking at right now are probably just complicated algorithms that leave an impression of an intelligent behavior.We seem to have a technology developed to do it right there “ of the shelf“ .But I think it sets the scenery and some sort of infrastructure ,also creating a “demand“ and opportunity to go beyond ...as a natural next step.

By the way I see the talk about basic income in msm as a sign more people might be put out of work because of automation too as is mentioned here .
And to create an intelligent machine.first we would have to be able to understand intelligence itself as a phenomenon. At least that is what I think.Don't know if that is possible for us.

Seems like a really huge task to accomplish .
Somehow I think it will be tried to shortcut that problem firstly by HQis of man with a machine . Talking about some scary possibilities there.
Wonder how much of it might already be going on somewhere in restricted research facilities.
Self driving cars,Siri ,new advances in robotics and automation ,intention of more and more job posts held by humans to be replaced by intelligent? machines ...Can not be done without some form of AI .
How do you think will this develop in the future to come?
”Hell, I could make that kind of shot, given only the speed of the motorcade, the ambient temperature, the ambient humidity, and the known fps of the bullet upon leaving the rifle. “

Could you place three shots( two in Kennedy,one in Connaly ) with a bolt action rifle which is (although with a scope ) very poorly adjusted in six seconds ?In real life conditions?With a moving target ?
Can a copper jacketed led bullet that caused a back entrance wound,exiting through the throat only to hit another human target through all the tissue and the fabric be found in a pristine condition ?

”If so, this bullet traversed 15 layers of clothing, 7 layers of skin, and approximately 15 inches of tissue, struck a necktie knot, removed 4 inches of rib, and shattered a radius bone. The bullet was found on a gurney in the corridor at the Parkland Memorial Hospital, in Dallas ... ” -Wikipedia- Single bullet theory

”Even at his best, Oswald had never been as good a shot as the experts from the army and the FBI. Oswald’s most recent test score in the Marines was barely above the minimum qualifying level. He was officially “a rather poor shot” (Warren Commission Hearings, vol.19, p.18) in 1959, and was hardly likely to have improved over the next four years.”
Quote by HeraTeleia
Bullets can take crazy trajectories upon leaving the chamber of any given rifle and then again upon first impact, all dependent upon literally thousands of variables. There is no conspiracy. No "magic bullet". Just basic physics. Sorry to disappoint.


And I completely agree with you on bullet trajectories .
But this one looks like it had quite amount of energy of it's own.Almost unbelievable agile and vigorous ...
Quote by HeraTeleia
Bullets can take crazy trajectories upon leaving the chamber of any given rifle and then again upon first impact, all dependent upon literally thousands of variables. There is no conspiracy. No "magic bullet". Just basic physics. Sorry to disappoint.


I don't have a very detail insight of the assassination ,have to admit that!My knowledge about it is mostly based on Oliver Stone's JFK .And when you see the movie, or take some time to examine some of the general facts personally, it becomes pretty difficult for me to believe it was a deed done solely by L.H. Oswald.

How could Oswald see Kennedy so well through the tree branches which seem to have been covered in green at that point ?
And why did the victim's head moved backward after the headshot if car was moving away from the alleged shooter ?
And wasn't Oswald already murdered when Robert Kennedy met the same fate ?
I still think Oswald was there just to be the one who takes the fall .
Quote by kornslayer1
Call me crazy, but I think people would prefer it to be a mystery. It could be just something simple, and that's it. Only we have no idea. Would it be satisfying to find out what really happened all these years?


That is an interesting thought actually .What really puzzles me is the fact that even after all these years passed by ,nothing much seems to be really revealed .Mostly lot of speculation ,good or bad leads and theories .Officially ,all there seems to be is highly questionable conclusion of the Warren commission about the assassination of the most prominent,charismatic and powerful politician of his time .And his brother followed shortly after?
Can't believe U.S. police force and intelligence agencies couldn't or can't do any better ...