Join the best erotica focused adult social network now
Login
mixedbabygirl
Over 90 days ago
Bisexual Female, 31
0 miles · Iowa City

Forum

Rookie Scribe
This is to all the submissive men and women out there. What do you look for in Dom, Daddy, Master, Mistress?

Just curious
Rookie Scribe
Quote by JohnC

I think it is semantics. The same as a Master can be a Sensual Dom or a more "hard" type. They are both "Masters". Does a Master stop being a Master if you call him "Sir"? No. Neither does a Daddy stop being a Master because you simply call him Daddy.

BUT... you can be a Daddy and NOT be a Master, but instead be a Mentor. The same as you can call a Mentor, Sir. The dynamic dictates, not the title in itself. And with "Daddy" I believe it has a wider range of uses than some other titles. Kind of like Sir does.

I believe the dynamic may have failed because it was not what the both of you needed. But the D/s roles were not any less Master/sub, D/s, or however folks want to express it. The dynamic was just not fitting a particular need.... kind of like buying the wrong car. If you buy a car that is too small for your needs it didn't stop BEING a car. You just needed a bigger car. ;)

And heck, not all dynamics work between people even if they are looking for and needing the same things. More than roles, titles, and dynamics need to match. YOU DO. It is kind of like saying "I love redheads who are chubby!". That does not mean every chubby redhead will be a match for you. And if a relationship fails, it did not mean what you both were not what you were; the relationship just failed.

Also not all D/s relationships are suited for Daddy/babygirl or Sensual Dom/sub (which is still Maser/sub). Maybe the dynamic was just off and you needed a different type of control? That does not make a Daddy any less of a Master, it just makes Him not the TYPE of control you need. SM has even harsher control and dynamics. Would those in an SM relationship think anything other than that hard of a dynamic is less of a Master? I don't think so.. or I would hope not. Because they are not.

On another note, but related.... I don't believe it is proper to use the term Master if you do not have a sub dedicated to you. I see many Doms online use the term Master, but then state they are looking for a sub/babygirl/slave/etc. I do not believe you ARE a Master unless you are actually in that role. You are simply a Dom. And IMO the same goes for slaves. You can't BE a slave unless you have a Master. It may be the role you like to take, but until you are owned, you are simply a free agent, or sub.

But that is how I see it... others may view it differently.




I agree with you JohnC on your other note I am an owned sub but receive dozens of messages a day from Master's who want to own me. I agree with you if you do not currently own a sub you are not a Master and if you accept another Master's sloppy second you are definitely not a Master i have been in D/S relationships before where I was allowed to play with permission without my Master but never ever was I to call another man sir or master or daddy or submit to whoever I was playing with
Rookie Scribe
Thanks all as a submissive with my own view on the terminology it's not to hear a Dom's point of view I agree with JohnC because I call my Dom Daddy but we are most definetely not interested in the little girl age play as we already get enough of the weird looks with our realistic age difference but I have had harder Dom's before him and they were Master not Daddy does that make him any less a Dom no but a different kind it's just difficult to explain to other curious would be submissives because you're right no one D/S relationship fits any sort of mold
Rookie Scribe
I've been asked this question several times by people newer to the lifestyle and no my opinion but I'd be interested in knowing the opinion of other seasoned Dominants and Submissives