Share your best sex tips, and maybe we could all learn something new together!
A few of mine:
-- When fucking missionary style, elevate the lady's butt with a few pillows or something. (Note: there is a product called the Liberator created specifically for this purpose.) This allows your cock to bump up against her G-spot with each thrust, creating an entirely new sensation for her.
-- When going down on a lady, cross your fingers (either two or three) and insert them with a twisting motion, in and out. It'll drive her crazy.
-- If she has a particularly sensitive clit, tease her by squeezing the folds surrounding her clit. Squeeze and release, or squeeze and slip it between your fingers, or jerk it up and down. If you find something she likes, don't stop!
-- If you've always wanted to experience a deepthroat blowjob, but your lady has a sensitive gag reflex, they sell a numbing spray in many adult novelty stores (or online.) The spray numbs the back of her throat and deadens the gag reflex. Word of caution: it'll also numb your cock, so after a while it won't be pleasurable for either of you. However, after two or three uses, she may be able to deepthroat without the spray! (Your mileage may vary.)
-- If you want to try to make your lady squirt, insert your middle and index fingers (like Spider-man) while she's on her back. If you make a "come-hither" motion with those fingers, she will really enjoy it, but if you want to make her squirt, you'll need to be more forceful. Instead of dragging your fingertips along her G-spot, you want to tap it with your fingertips in an up-and-down motion. Just make sure she's laying on some towels or something, as it could get messy!
Your turn!
Sorry, but [s]are we now using[/s] I don't perceive Wikipedia as an unquestionable source of information. Again, my definition of the political spectrum is my own, formed by my own experiences. I'm happy to adopt yours if you can adequately persuade me. [s]Wikipedia's spectrum seems sorely lacking[/s] I do not believe Wikipedia is reliable, and although I'm aware that it cites several reputable sources, I elect to reject Wikipedia's information. It is my opinion that true Capitalism requires a free market, and I firmly believe that Fascism is antithetical to free-market capitalism. I also believe that Fascism requires the state to mandate supply and pricing. I personally don't believe that is Capitalism. And I certainly don't believe it's close to "small government" or "right-wing."
The Nazis were Fascist. The word "Nazi" is an acronym (in German, obviously) for National Socialist Workers Party. How on earth can Socialists be "right-wing?"
Regardless of how you define the political spectrum, if you use my definition, Fascists are as left-wing as Socialists. I'm not saying this makes your definition less valid than mine, but I can only speak to my own perspective, and no one else's. Nazi Germany is responsible for six million murders of innocent civilians. I firmly believe that Socialism and Communism are responsible for over 200 million senseless murders. (And that doesn't count the murders committed by the North Koreans, North Vietnamese, Cubans, Venezuelans, or Cambodians.) It is my personal opinion that Socialism is the [s]greatest evil[/s] ickiest thing ever conceived by man, and I believe it's not even a close contest. I also firmly believe that free-market capitalism has lifted billions of people out of poverty in the last century alone, as my personal experience has shown me that much.
*Edited by moderator. Original post does not align with the nature of The Spa.
Both the Afghanistan and Iraq wars shared broad bipartisan support in congress, so I'm not sure that "Republicanism" can be blamed for either war. Hillary was every bit as enthusiastic about invading Iraq as Bush was. It's something [s]we seem to have forgotten[/s] that many may have forgotten,[s] as the Democrats and the media (but I repeat myself) have rewritten history[/s] and many different factors may contribute to that, as there's no definitive proof that it was just one thing.
What I personally believe you are describing, Verbal, is Libertarianism -- which I perceive is more closely aligned with the Republican Party. I believe that libertarians are fiscal conservatives, socially-liberal, and tend toward an isolationist foreign policy. I consider myself to be a Libertarian (mostly) when it comes to domestic policy, but disagree with the isolationist mentality.
Ideally, I believe people should be left alone as much as possible, and should have the right to do whatever they choose, so long as it doesn't interfere with anyone else's rights to do the same. The purpose of government is to protect our rights, secure our freedom, enforce our laws, and provide the infrastructure we need to prosper. I completely disagree with this notion of government as nanny-state overseers of every facet of our lives from cradle-to-grave.
*Edited by moderator. Some parts of the original post did not align with the nature of The Spa.
Let's face the truth: we vote for the president based on his/her personality. That has been true since the dawn of the television era. With each and every election, we've lowered the bar of qualification to the point where celebrities now have a legitimate chance to become president.
Given the lack of "bench strength", youth, and dynamic personality on the Democratic side, it would shock me if they DON'T nominate a celebrity as their 2020 candidate. With nearly all of Hollywood identifying with the far-left of the party, they have plenty of candidates from which to choose.
Every "hotwife" situation is different. Some wives are free to go out on their own and fuck anyone they'd like. Some may be asked to provide hubby with details of the affair as a term of condition. Some may be required to take photos or videos. Some husbands may insist that he be present to watch -- or participate. Some may include some form of humiliation for the husband by the wife and/or her lover.
"Hotwife" is as broad a term as "swinging." At the end of the day, you make the rules and decide what's best for you both.
Picking up a complete stranger in a bar or nightclub is a bit risky -- in many ways. You'll find greater success using all of the various online sites and apps that are now available. That way, you can get to know that person (or persons) before you even meet face-to-face. You can get a pretty good idea about a person just from online correspondence.
Once you find that person, set up a strictly "vanilla" meeting in a public place. Make it clear that nothing will happen on that "first date." If all goes well, then the sky is the limit!
Doesn't every married couple own at least one?
Her favorite is the Magic Wand. She can get off within SECONDS. It always amazes me. I really wish there were an equivalent toy for men!
As for how we use it, my favorite way is to combine it with our "wedge." I slip it under her ass, which props her up off the mattress, and apply the wand directly to her clit. Between the angle created by the wedge and the "magic" of the wand, she goes absolutely insane.
Of course, we can only do this when we're alone in the house -- which isn't nearly often enough.
Although the sample size is far too small to derive any meaningful conclusions, I can't help but notice the pattern. Thanks to all who responded.
Given that response, Bethany, I'll go ahead and assume the rest of your responses!
A little research project for the married ladies only...
Question 1: How many years have you been married?
Question 2: On a scale of 1-10 (10 being the most fulfilling), how would you rate your sex life?
Question 3: Depending on your score above, what is special or missing about your sex life?
Question 4: How often do you have sex?
Question 5: In the past year, have you only had sex with your husband?
Thanks in advance!
It really depends on the definition of "been with." If it's actual penetration, the number is two. Sucking/groping/kissing, etc.? I'd really need to think about it!
It's happened to me before. The feeling isn't nearly as intense, but it still feels like an orgasm.
I'm embarrassed to admit that I have gone the Craigslist route before. Thankfully, it turned out well, but it could have gone wrong in so many ways. When I look back, I can't believe I did something so reckless.
I answered an ad from a husband who wanted someone to give his wife a massage. We exchanged photos and agreed to meet. Thankfully, she looked exactly like her photo -- maybe better. When we exchanged messages, the husband was adamant that it would be only a massage. Things escalated quickly, though.
She stripped down to her panties and lay on the bed, face-down. She said I could remain clothed or strip, so I chose to wear only my boxers. I straddled her back and began working my way down. By the time I reached her ass, I was sporting a full-on woody that would "accidentally" brush along the crack of her ass every now and then.
I wasn't sure where the two of them would allow me to touch her, so I kept testing the limits. She let me massage her ass over her panties, so I occasionally worked my hands beneath the fabric and massaged her bare ass. When neither of them objected, I just removed her panties altogether.
She flipped over, and that's when it became obvious that I wasn't there to merely give her a massage. After "massaging" and sucking her tits, I went down on her. While I did that, hubby positioned himself at her head and she sucked his cock.
After a while, he signaled to me to remove my boxers and take his place. While she took my cock in her mouth, he fucked her. She was actually very good, and brought me quickly to the edge. Just before I popped, he asked if I had a condom. I strapped it on and flipped her over to enter from behind while her husband fucked her mouth. The two of us finished at about the same time.
That's my story, believe it or not! Don't try this at home.
There was a study a few years ago conducted by a university in Ontario where men and women were surveyed on various sexual issues. The researchers tracked the subjects' responses over time and reported the results. One of the questions posed to the subjects was to rank their sexual satisfaction from 1-10. Another asked them to rank their sexual desire using the same scale.
The study found that those respondents who were in long-term relationships (marriage or otherwise) showed no significant difference in sexual satisfaction over time, regardless of gender. On the issue of sexual desire, the study found no difference among the men. But for every year in which a woman maintained a sexually-exclusive relationship with a man, the rating of sexual desire was significantly lower each and every year.
This seems to match what I have observed, both from my own perspective and from listening to male friends who have been in long-term, sexually-exclusive, relationships. The universal lament seems to be that when a man and woman first meet, their libidos are off the charts. They have sex as often as possible, and in every way their creativity will allow. Over time, men's libidos remain high, while their partner's plummets.
Obviously, there are exceptions to the rule for both men and women. My question for the ladies is: has this been your experience? Does desire wane over time the longer you are with the same man? If so, why do you think that is?
Cumming in a nice, warm mouth feels amazing, but for some reason I've always been incredibly aroused by the idea of giving a woman a facial. It just seems so dirty and wrong. The prettier the face, the more it seems. I will always remember the first time I saw a facial in a porn movie. Until then, something that naughty had never occurred to me.
I've only actually done it a few times in my life, which is probably a good thing since it preserves that " " nature.
I think everyone who begins a new relationship eventually gets around to having "the talk" about your sexual past. We've all heard that when women report this number, you should multiply it by some factor (2, 5, 10, etc.). My question to the ladies is: did you lie to your current (or most recent) significant other? If so, how drastic was your lie?
Is there a way to make your photos and/or albums password-protected or viewable only to friends or select users?
I'd recommend treading very slowly. Start by talking about your fantasies. Maybe show each other the porn or erotic stories you like. Then incorporate a little role playing if you're into that thing. Then maybe -- maybe -- bring up the question of whether or not she would ever be willing to act on your fantasies.
Best of luck!
When you're a teenager: embarrassing.
When you're my age: pretty much the greatest feeling in the world.
I kid.
If you really want to know, a cock becomes incredibly sensitive when fully-engorged. The slightest touch causes waves of pleasure. As for "pain", this idea that it is painful, or this notion of "blue balls" is something that guys tell girls to make them feel guilty enough to "relieve their pain."
(Sorry for ruining that secret, guys.)
Favorite classic porn: Stiff Competition
Favorite amateur porn: a video where a young girl sucks off the pizza guy.
I like them so much, in fact, I wrote stories based on each of them! (One is posted here, the other is coming soon.)
Hello. Lush newbie here with a question for the vets. I'm thinking of writing a lengthy story about a married couple that ventures into the swinging lifestyle. Over time, they begin to move away from swinging into more of an "open marriage" where they "play" separately. The wife then explores her submissive side with her husband and becomes a "cuckquean". Eventually, they end up back where they began, but with a backlog of experiences, memories, and insight.
This story seems to span so many categories (group sex, wife lovers, BDSM, etc.) that I don't know how to categorize it. Is it better to include all of the chapters in the same category, or categorize each chapter by its prevailing theme? If I do the latter, won't readers find it hard to follow the story?
Thanks in advance for your advice.
