Do I get another $10,000 for crossing the road to get back home again, or will my butt nakedness be sheathed from inquisitive eyes once I reach my destination? Oh, and will the monies be paid in Pounds Sterling? I know it's a small thing, but the queues in the banks nowadays are just unbearable.
Silly Kids Games - The Damned
Radish
Yes, I know it is a noun but I was feeling ...
Rebellious
There are no secrets in The Order of Women Freemason x
That tender flesh so provocatively offered, it would be rude not to ...
Spank
Why, oh why, oh why?
What does it matter?
The purpose of a competition is to engage with the community, to inspire them to create, and to create a buzz. Surely, the ideal is to reach and involve as many members as possible.
It seems to me that the idea of banning 'heavy editing' or 'co-authoring' is based on a flawed belief that two contributors will create something 'better' than anything that can be created by a single individual acting alone and therefore provides them with an unfair advantage. This is palpable nonsense.
A competition should showcase the best writing and the best authors on Lush. It should inspire all of us to try to do better. Hopefully, the best story will win; or at least the story that finds the most favour with the reading public will win. How many individuals contributed to the creation of that entry seems to me to be irrelevant. Creating petty restrictions merely reduces the desire of individuals (both new and long-standing) to enter the competition; which is counter-productive.
And just to settle any concerns: this post was entirely my own work; it has received no editing either light or heavy from any other person (Lush author or otherwise) and no animals were harmed in its construction.