If someone only reads and doesn't write, do you think they're more likely to give a lower score to someone's story?
And if you're a reader, not a writer (we love our readers, btw do you have a red and white avatar??
Quote by Magical_felix
Kind of hard to say either way. I think other authors are more likely to vote though. A lot of readers don't even join the site. They just read. I know I didn't join until I had to because I wanted to post a story.
What I can say for certain is that if you have a low vote count, say under 15 a story, then the voters don't find your stories very compelling. Not compelling enough to give it a vote anyway. Since most every story here has above a 4.9 score I would say that anything below that isn't too hot. 4.6 is getting on the low end of quality.
Quote by Maryana
Writers can't know what a reader scored??
Quote by Green_Man
Actually, if one is not getting lots of scores coming in at the same time, and one is watching the timeline, one can see what someone's score is on ones story. For example, you just gave me a 5 on my latest story. Even though you left no comment I could see when you scored. Thank you, dear Maryana.
Quote by Simmerdownchick
I would agree with most of what you're saying. But I think a writer has to earn those higher numbers. If you're new, you're most likely fairly unknown so lower scores have to be expected. It's like anything else, I guess. You gotta work for it to earn it.
Quote by overmykneenow
OK this is how it works for 95%+ of all votes cast on stories here:
1) The message voters are intending to convey -
5 = I liked your story or you, maybe both
Anything else = I dislike you personally
2) How that message is understood by the author -
5 = You're an amazing author/poet
Anything else = watch your back, you have an enemy hell bent on maliciously destroying your writing career
Quote by MonsoonMicky
Of the 30 stories on my homepage there is a combined total of 282 story votes. Those votes are as follows:
Votes of 1 -- 0
Votes of 2 -- 0
Votes of 3 -- 1
Votes of 4 -- 11
Votes of 5 -- 270
Quote by MonsoonMicky
Yes, at last, someone who can see it for what it is. The scoring is superficial. People are not using the voting system for what it's intended for.
I'll do a little more research, but as far as I tell, at least 95% of votes on all stories are a 5. Why is that?
And I can't believe that people are debating whether or not non-writers give lower scores. How can people debate such a thing when only a mere 5% of scores given are less than 5. I'm confused; I don't understand what's going on here.
Quote by overmykneenow
To be fair the scoring is never going to display an even distribution of scores - it's not like reviewing something you bought on amazon or rating an app you downloaded - if you don't like a story invariably readers will skip it and move on to the next one. You have to question the motivation of anyone who stuck with a story just score it a two when there are so many other stories around they could be enjoying.
As other have mentioned, the scoring system is a long way from perfect - that's why many people seem to treat it as a Like button.
Quote by MonsoonMicky
Yes, at last, someone who can see it for what it is. The scoring is superficial. People are not using the voting system for what it's intended for.
I'll do a little more research, but as far as I tell, at least 95% of votes on all stories are a 5. Why is that?
And I can't believe that people are debating whether or not non-writers give lower scores. How can people debate such a thing when only a mere 5% of scores given are less than 5. I'm confused; I don't understand what's going on here.
Quote by adagio_sabadicus
Unfortunately, scoring becomes a popularity contest. It's pretty obvious. I feel if a story is verified, it should be no less than 4. One doesn't have to care for it, because writers have different styles. I write because I wish to and I don't play the patronizing game for fame. What is to be had by being a Lush celebrity? Its all a matter of truth.