For women who have experienced both, do you have a preference for a cut or uncut penis? Is it an aesthetic preference (the looks of one over the other) or does a foreskin make a difference in oral sex and intercourse?
Intact, please. Sorry to say it, but a cut one looks wrong to me, and I love playing with the foreskin. Yes, it makes a difference. And I prefer the term "intact", as opposed to "uncut". Intact is the norm nature delivered, "cut" is the human variation on it. Just my opinion.
Definitely circumcised - though there aren't that many here in England. That over excess of skin can be most off-putting ... and even if the guy bathes regularly, chances are he'll still have traces of 'smegma' (horrible, smelly, bacteria) which coats the glans and inner foreskin.
As a girl who comes from a medical family and a Biology student, I'm pretty sure this 'smegma' is a very contributory cause of cervical cancer.
If I have sex with an uncircumcised male I always make sure we shower together first and I completely withdraw his foreskin an cleanse all parts with anti-bacterial wash.
I am cut and enjoy being that way ...but uncut does have a stronger more masculine look i believe
I don't really care, as long as he's clean down there I'm happy.
www.szadvntures.com
Latest story:
He's asking for the gals' opinions of what they prefer. Not the guys'.
A cock is a cock is a cock. I've had both and it makes no difference to me whatsoever.
Wow Laurenxxx, I just read your comments and I strongly disagree. Cervical cancer is usually caused by the HPV virus and that's not caused by a cut versus uncut cock. I have been up close and personal with both kinds and there is nothing that needs to be cleaned off. I like the taste and smell of a man as long as he practises regular hygiene like everyone should.
It's a known medical fact that HPV is passed on by one infected person to the next - even kissing with a suitably affected person can result in throat cancer and similarly sex can do the same.
At present there is a 'study' being conducted using persons of Western descent and persons of Jewish extraction.
It is commonly known that Jewish males are all circumcised. The 'study' ... though not having reached fully conclusive findings ... shows favourably towards the presence of "cause for concern" ... particularly in males who are somewhat lax in their bathing habits. If you have not bathed for 8 hours or more there WILL be smegma breeding nicely between the foreskin and the glans.
As for offending a poor guys feelings when I ask him to bathe and use an anti-bacterial wash. Well ....bloody tough!! .... If the guy's lucky enough to get me to have sex with him that should be the least of his problems. Or do males think they have a right to possibly give us a death sentence?
prefered long n hard
foreskin is just a turn on tho
Curcumsized definitely! That extra skin is a major turn off!
Laurenxxx, I think you have some massive misconceptions about penis, maybe even paranoia.
Sometimes I wish I could get a circumcision as an adult but I think that would be hell as I get erections multiple times a day so recovery would at least I imagine it would be painful. That and the head of my penis is very sensitive and I can't imagine how insane it would be touching everything, like fabric and things. Ouch.
Being uncut in the US is nerve wracking. From negative personal experiences to popular culture and TV/movies bad mouthing uncut cocks, it can be nauseating at times, at least for me.
In order to know virtue, you must first become acquainted with vice.
- Donatien Alphonse Francois de Sade
-------
En vis mann slår aldri en hund i klubben med en stokk, fordi hunden vil vende rundt og biter mannens ballene av. I like the way a big uncut cock feels, the skin all sliding up and down inside me. Not that turn down one thats cut, but I like peeling it back like a banana then giving it a nice lick or five too.
Sorry but uncut turns me off actually.