Quote by Chryses

... chuckling ... "coup coup"? You sound like someone else!

What do you mean? You're the one who makes multiple accounts. You remind me of the guy from Split, except all your personalities are dumbasses.

Quote by Chryses

I found it encouraging that the Senators were not partisan and criticized the FBI and DHS for failing to weigh the social media communications. The riot would probably have been handled better had the agencies treated the information seriously enough.

Also like, if the conservatives weren't coup coup for coco puffs, 1/6 would not be a shameful date in the history books.

Quote by ElCoco

I'm afraid we'll have to agree to disagree on this issue.

You've embarrassed yourself again.

Quote by ElCocko

I think you need to be reminded they’re different because you’ve spent the last few posts associating them as if they mean the same.

.

I don’t think a thread about racially discriminatory policy has anything to do with reparations because “policy” doesn’t have the same meaning as “reparations.”

.

Yes, that’s right. When I looked at the posts in this thread, none of them gave me any impression that providing resources to people who have been denied resources is racism. I also don’t think anybody’s said or suggested the agency’s racist. Have you found any posts that make you think the poster believes providing resources to people who have been denied resources is racism?

.

Yes, you’ve said several times now you think a policy that discriminates based on race isn’t racially discriminatory.

.

How to fix the inequality you and I are aware of is a different question, and like reparations, it might be a good thread topic, but it definitely isn’t the topic of this thread. Before you ask, I’ll tell you I think racial discrimination isn’t the right way to go.

So you don't have a point besides a semantical one about the word "racism" itself... Profound.

Quote by Chryses

I suspected this was true. FBI failed 'at fundamental level' before Capitol riot, Senate report claims

The FBI and other US government agencies failed "at a fundamental level" to assess the potential for violence ahead of the Capitol riot on 6 January 2021, a new report claims.

Democrats on a Senate panel found the FBI and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) "downplayed" the risks and so did not properly prepare.

Translation: the Capitol wore a too short of a skirt to the wrong frat party.

Quote by ElCocko

No, I don't think I'm being purposely obtuse.

oh...

It's by accident

damn

The right wingers are fighting to prove who is the bigger nazi or something. Both sides were wearing masks btw

https://twitter.com/TheKevinDalton/status/1672981248598499330

Quote by Chryses

See my response above.

I won, tenderfoot.

Quote by Chryses

If attacking me and defending racist policies is what floats your boat, by all means have at it! Keep in mind that because the policies are racist, they fail the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

I have cornered you with logic once again.

I accept your surrender.

Quote by Chryses

Methinks 'tis a gallant gesture of yours to offer those prized items of yours to me as tokens of your surrender.

Who is the policy racist against? And how long has the policy been around?

The reason Chryses, with his below average mouse sized testicles, is scared to answer my questions is as follows.

Who is the policy racist against?

Answer: White people.

And how long has the policy been around?

Answer: Decades.

Now this proves the policy being "racist" doesn't matter because if we were to crunch some numbers... White people have no trouble starting businesses. In fact, most business owners, CEOs and most positions of power really, are held by white people.

Penny-Chryses knows this. That's why he can't bring himself to answer those two simple questions because it completely negates the whole point of his thread... That the policy is designed to be racist to white people which would put them at a disadvantage.

But in reality, racism against white people in America isn't a thing. Not a thing enough to actually economically or socially put them at a disadvantage.

The real point of Chryses' thread is to just actually be racist against minorities by attempting to get white people angry about "anti-white racism", that in reality, doesn't actually exist when it comes to this policy.

It's just right wing culture war poison think. An attempt to create more racism.

"Hey white people, your enemy is minorities! Not corporations, rich people and politicians." <-- That is what conservatives are desperate to make people think.

Quote by Chryses

I shall take that as an acknowledgment you had not noticed my question was, "When Should the Federal Government use Race to Exclude Beneficiaries?" not how long have those policies existed.

Who is the policy racist against? And how long has the policy been around?

Answer if thou be-est a man or deflect if thou be-est a mouse, with small testicles, even for a mouse.

Nah..

https://abc30.com/joe-smith-fresno-county-sheriffs-office-immanuel-schools/13417311/

Quote by Chryses

My question was, "When Should the Federal Government use Race to Exclude Beneficiaries?" not how long have those policies existed. Did you notice?

I guess when your thin veneer of dumbassery wears off, there's just a big fat pussy underneath.

Good day, Penny Chryses.

Quote by Chryses

So, how did your SBA research go?

Who is the policy racist against? And how long has the policy been around?

Simple questions about a thread you started, but if you're too scared to answer, that's fine I guess.

Quote by Chryses

That question has already been answered in this thread.

edited

Sounds like you know I will corner you with logic again so you're afraid to answer.

Quote by Chryses

Some people cannot see clearly while some people can.

Some people support racist policies while some people are opposed to them.

Who is the policy racist against? And how long has the policy been around?

Quote by Tantaleyes

You're the one who's defending racist policies and attacking people who don't agree with you.

OK but pretending to be black online to spew right wing nonsense is weird. Even you have to admit that.

Quote by Tantaleyes

Maybe, if I was stuck trying to defend racist policies, I'd attack the people who didn't agree with me instead of arguing the merits.

But why do conservative weirdos do this? What you're doing here.

Quote by Tantaleyes

Growing up in a system that says "special treatment's OK for certain classes of people" creates and supports people who want to get and keep getting the special treatment. The system creates a client class of people who expect support. That's where I break ranks, because that's not good for the individual, even though the class benefits.

Why do conservative weirdos do this?

The incredibly bizarre Dean Browning and “Dan Purdy” Twitter drama, explained

A politician was accused of using a fake burner account for a gay Black Trump supporter. That’s when things got weird. 

https://www.vox.com/the-goods/2020/11/10/21559458/dean-browning-dan-purdy-byl-holte-patti-labelle-twitter-gay-black-man

Quote by Chryses

You are mistaken.

While I do recommend getting rid of racism, I did not do so in lieu of helping people.

Yes you did dumbass.

Quote by Chryses

One approach would be to find, pursue and eliminate the racism that holds back those who the agency claims to assist.

That would not require implementing racist policies.

Quote by Chryses

As I recall, the last time a final solution was attempted, it led to an unsatisfactory resolution, correct?

There is no "final solution" and no perfecting humanity.

What I suggest in lieu of your final solution is improvement.

Everyone can improve.

Even those who think they are beyond improvement.

You suggested getting rid of racism instead of helping people, who may not have the same advantages, with their businesses.

It's like saying, we need to get rid of hate or joy or stupidity or whatever else. You know, as I know, that racism is just inherent in some people. It will always be there, especially in America. You know that. Your dumb response of, "lets focus on abolishing racism" is just that, dumb and disingenuous.

Not sure I trust these guys 100%

https://www.wyff4.com/amp/article/south-carolina-deputy-voyeriusm-newberry-county/44301367

Quote by Chryses

One approach would be to find, pursue and eliminate the racism that holds back those who the agency claims to assist.

That would not require implementing racist policies.

So... a final solution but for racists?

MAGA

Quote by Dani

I was just wondering why they all get to see the game for free while the people in the stands paid their hard-earned money. While I'm being sarcastic, those were genuine complaints I saw the first time I ever saw this graphic a few years ago, particularly because the version I saw contained a third panel where the fence was removed, and no one needed extra support, symbolizing that instead of helping people adjust to the barrier, the barrier was removed entirely.

My favorite version of this uses an apple tree as a metaphor:

Programs like the MBDA are a great stepping stone to addressing the stain of continued systemic racism in this country (the US), but eradicating the need for such an organization should be the ultimate goal, because the barriers that make such organizations and programs necessary should no longer exist.

Is that a spider pulling the tree to the right? That's just nonsense.

And how about just grow your own tree on your own land. No one will loan you money to buy land? Tough shit, get a job. Can't get a good job because you can't afford college? Too bad, get 3 shitty jobs. Don't get paid enough to buy land? Cuts had to be made and you got fired first because of seniority or whatever? GET FUCKED! Ask your parents for money. They don't have any generational wealth to hand down because they couldn't afford college to get a good job and they were always fired first too, traffic ticket turned into jail time, bank laughed at them, couldn't afford health insurance? FUCK YOU! Go back to whatever racist country you're from. This is America, the land of equality.

Quote by Tantaleyes

Do you mean equity as in justice according to natural law or right, or freedom from bias or favoritism, or

something fair and impartial?

She wants to tear down the system white people built to favor white people which is not fair to white people at all. It's clear racism.

Quote by AngelEthics

I wouldn't call it racism. I would call it equity. I do think this is one answer. Have you ever seen this image?

This group is part of the ramp.

Edited to say that I do not endorse the idea that equity creates rainbows.

First of all they are playing soccer? That's xenophobic against Americans.

Secondly, why doesn't the man get a comfortable place to sit down as well?

Thirdly why does the girl in the middle get a second crate?

Why is the man punished?

Quote by Tantaleyes

I didn't say it was revenge.

New racism not fixing old racism is like revenge being unjust. They're examples of pushing a wrong from the past into the future. Neither one fixes the wrong of the past, do they?

At this rate there won't be any white people left in America.

Quote by Dani

Makes me wonder who's gonna keep these kids safe from armed guards that mean them harm.

A backup armed guard, for the first one. Sniper tower for the backup armed guard. Maybe a drone that can be quickly deployed to blow up the school if all else fails.

Quote by Tantaleyes

**[edited by moderator]**, what's your problem with less racism?

**[edited by moderator]**, I said we need to stop all this racism against whites and you got all upset. This is what I mean. This is why white people can't get ahead in this country.