Quote by DirtyDazza
I'm not actually sure that this Xporno site can be accused of plagiarism.
I've just been doing some research, and from what I've gathered, an act of literary theft can only be classed as plagiarism if the perpetrators are passing off someone else's work as their own.
I've not checked the site out, but from what I've gathered from previous posts here, the people responsible are not claiming the stolen works were written by themselves. Instead merely posting them without crediting the genuine author.
Can posting someone else's work on another site be classed as plagiarism if the perps are not taking credit and claiming they wrote it? It's literary theft, certainly, but is it plagiarism?
I honestly don't know the answer; law isn't my strong suit.
You can’t truly call yourself peaceful unless you are capable of violence. If you’re not capable of violence, you’re not peaceful. You’re harmless.
Quote by sweetsinner
From what I understand the stories can't be copied in standard viewing format. Is that correct?
=== Not ALL LIVES MATTER until BLACK LIVES MATTER ===
Quote by noll
No, only the context menu is disabled (which is actually bad usability practice), but CMD+C on OS X still works and I assume the same goes for CTRL+C on Windows. But even if that was disabled as well, then it would still be possible to copy the text. It would just be a little harder to do it manually, but in cases like xporno.tv it seems highly unlikely that it's done by hand anyway.
Quote by sweetsinner
Thanks, I know the keyboard functions still work, however, I can't actually select text in stories at all (almost like it is an embedded jpg or similar), which is more what I was referring to. I (wrongly) assumed disabling the ability to select (and therefore copy) in that manner would have prevented some of the plagiarism issues but I see it's far more than that.
=== Not ALL LIVES MATTER until BLACK LIVES MATTER ===
Quote by DirtyDazza
I'm not actually sure that this Xporno site can be accused of plagiarism.
I've just been doing some research, and from what I've gathered, an act of literary theft can only be classed as plagiarism if the perpetrators are passing off someone else's work as their own.
I've not checked the site out, but from what I've gathered from previous posts here, the people responsible are not claiming the stolen works were written by themselves. Instead merely posting them without crediting the genuine author.
Can posting someone else's work on another site be classed as plagiarism if the perps are not taking credit and claiming they wrote it? It's literary theft, certainly, but is it plagiarism?
I honestly don't know the answer; law isn't my strong suit.
Quote by noll
That would be ignoring the way the web works and there are many downsides to that:
- text gets blurry when zooming in, unless the image is really huge
- text can't be read out loud by screen readers
- text won't be indexed by search engines
- text won't adapt to different screen sizes
There's always a risk of content being copied when one publishes online. You're either willing to take that risk or you shouldn't publish online. An advantage is that online copies are way easier to track than offline copies though.
Quote by gilrenard
- That would be ignoring the way the web works
Like Tumblr?
Quote by gilrenard
- text gets blurry when zooming in, unless the image is really huge
The image size doesn't have to be huge to be crisp, 3000 words in an image = @ 250KB. Zooming in on my cell phone, the image below is fine to read.
Quote by gilrenard
- text can't be read out loud by screen readers
Meh, I never use text to speech. Don't know anyone who does.
Quote by gilrenard
- text won't adapt to different screen sizes.
The text does not adapt to screens already. I can only zoom in and out on Lush. Too big and I have to scroll left to right.
=== Not ALL LIVES MATTER until BLACK LIVES MATTER ===