Holy crap. Seems just a wee bit extreme don't ya think? Even by the ridiculous break down of how that money could be spent shouldn't then the mom, Supermodel Linda Evangelista, also have to be responsible for matching the $46k from her ex?
When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser. Socrates That's a lot of money. I wonder is she'll spend every cent of it on the kid or syphon off a lot of it for herself?
What in the hell would $46,000.00 pay for per month?
Fuck me!
Seriously? That's insane! It takes me three years to make that much. Why doesn't she share the love? These are the same people that fight the tax laws tooth and nail to save a few dollars while the common man has to deal with supporting them and their kiss me I'm rich lifestyle. Just plain unacceptable!
The decisions we make dictate the life we have.
Follow your dreams, for those that do not will only try to discourage others.
That kid will only see a fraction of that money. That golddigger will be living sweet!
EEppppss and here I was bitching about only getting $300 a month in child support for two teenagers. (well fighting to get it). I need a better lawyer. Thats outrageous.
I was the kid next door's imaginary friend.
How much money does the father make? Shouldn't a father or mother support a child in the best manner that they can afford? Should the mother be stuck with all the work of raising a child, and the father only give the kid what he wants? Yatzee is right; these people aren't like us. Rich people live much better than those of us who struggle from paycheck to paycheck, but the amount of money doesn't matter. If a man has a child by a woman he should pay child support. If he has children by three different women he should pay enough child support to all three so that they can live in the circumstances that he can afford for himself.
If this father has children by another woman and actually raises them in his home, should the child he doesn't raise be less fortunate than the ones he does?
Lafayettemister, if the father of the child devotes equal time to raising and caring for the child, getting it to bed, feeding it, changing it's diaper etc, the Linda Evangelista should also chip in 46K. Otherwise, screw him.
[url]http://[/url] That's way to much. Period, end of story.
And child support depends, if the womens well off such as the person in this case the dad shouldn't have to pay a dime. It's obvious she's milking the baby. it's not a stock or bond. if she can afford a damn lawyer to actually win that much she doesnt need a damn cent of it, and I guarantee you the kid won't see any of it. it should be dependent on the financial needs of either parent. If the dad has custody, it only fair it should work both ways.
ok....that is way to much to be asking for a 4 year old
i have a 3 year and i am only asking 3 hundred
but come $46k per month ?
way to much
WTF The woman should be taken aside and told the facts of life!!!
WTF The woman should be taken aside and told the facts of life!!!
well, everything is relative yeah? most that are reading this, me included, its a vast sum of cash. but i just read or saw rather a photo essay about children and where they sleep. there was one little girl whos mother spends 1k a month on her wardrobe alone. i am sure that with tutors, education, music lessons, nannies and drivers and what have you, her mom spends close to that 46k. when you are taking about people with a net worth of millions or billions then 46K is drop in the bucket.