Dominant, animalistic, fiery sex that holds one on the edge of loss of control, pain and pleasure.
Ummm never, besides I don't spank and tell ;)
Its all in perception and individual desires. For many of us, or at least my friends and I when we have discussed such things, a common thread for us how desired we felt. Is that rough/intense play because our lover wants us so badly that he just devours us - and that is very, very, very hot. Such unbridled passion just for me also makes me want to submit entirely to his intense desire and see where that would takes us. The flip side - force and roughness just for him to satiate his desire to derive pleasure because I have pain and no pleasure is not for me.
i have HUGE non consent fantasies. and irl it is a big turnon when i know a Man isnt going to take no for an answer. This is going to happen...i can just decide how much i want to be hurt resisting.
i like sex more equal and intimate with girls. But with men, i want to know im prey.
mmmmmmmmm
I seem to have missed this the first time it was presented, but since it has appeared I'll share my $.02.
I tend to like a little rougher sex then many of the girls I hang out with. I'm not entirely certain why, but for me sex is about abandon. For me to orgasm, I have to release my control, and I rarely do that. So I have to trust the person I'm with to relax enough to get to that point. I'm also a bigger girl (6') so I always feel I have to hold back. Rougher sex lets me feel I can just be me, without having to hold on to the thread of control. That said, I in no way agree to the statement about "when your partner wont take no for an answer." There's an ugly word for that, and its not one I enjoy with sex.
Basically, I want to release control, not worry about restraining myself. when I push my partner for more, it's because I want to 'feel' it and to be more connected.
I am not against this. I am more into rough sex i have to say because the tensions run high and it's highly erotic.
I think it's all in the interpretation of the wording. I agree with most posters that what will turn one on, may have the total opposite effect for another.
I think I like the IDEA of someone being rough with me, and not so much the ACTION of it happening. I haven't actually had much experience with rough, without forceful (not the "good" kind of rough/forceful anyway). I like the idea of a guy being dominant, and taking control of me sexually... but I also find it hard to give the actual control over to him completely. Hence, I like the idea.
My hubby is not dominant person. In fact, he's not as "actively sexual" as I am. (Not the typical guy, I guess... doesn't have sex on the brain 24/7.)
The specific things that do turn me on include:
light bondage
spanking (not too much though)
forceful guidance
bouncing
dirty talk and abusive language (name calling and filth words to describe body parts)
Since I identify as a primal, and my last several partners have also, our sex is more basic and as far from vanilla as possible. I want to be taken...completely dominated. His satisfaction is my arousal and my release. I also tend to claw and bite a good bit...lol.
while reading all the above replies i some how agree with DD.
although i don't like force or rough sex.. but like every other every woman i desire to be pinned and devoured...
it makes me feel special that i man actually want me.
Rough and forceful just means dominant to me. Not cruel, degrading .
I know some people are into that sort of thing too, and to each his own. I'm simply saying that is what the words mean to me...