Let's say that you are ageing and not a big winner in the genetic lottery when it comes to looks.
If you had the cash, would it give you incentive to go for a girl that was way out of your league just for the sex and ego-boost? Would it bother you if she was just after you for the money or is this just considered "fair trade" for having a hot girl on your arm and in your bed if you were not able to attract the kind of girl you really wanted on your own.
Be honest!
ps. And no, I'm not asking this because I am one.
If even at this point, I hit the lotto, or I had the cash. Eye candy would be the last thing on my mind. There would be no "trade-off" I could envision.
If she was just after me for the cash and prizes (the pure gold digger) then no way. But I do like to give things to those I love so they may be part of the package (the "likes me AND my money"). Don't you love shades of grey? lol
look at these boys taking the moral high ground!! kudos kids, i have the money and the looks and am young as well. Hypothetically speaking if i felt that i wasnt being able to get the reaction i wanted, id use my money asset just like other guys use their body, or their cars, or their social significance to demand attention.
ive gotten with girls just because of the bike i own, would you judge me or her her??
what im saying Ash is your looking at the whole gold digging thing the wrog way. How you should be looking at it is the same way you see women getting attracted to men with nice eyes, smile, body, butt, sense of humor , and the list goes on. So what if a girl is attracted to a man who can provide them with financial stability and she happens to be smoking hot. Show me one girl who doesnt want to be pampered and ill show you a world full of them.
Dont Hate Dont Judge, just do your thing
To be totally honest, in that situation I'd do it. But not for an ego boost. It would be for the hot girl and the hot sex. By the way, this practice has been done for centuries. How else to explain grown men in their 30's or 40's marrying teenaged girls throughout history. The dowry was once and expected part of marriage. The wealthier you were, the larger dowry you'd give to the bride's father. And the more you'd have to offer your new young bride to keep her happy.
I'd be curious to see the the Gals reaction put similarly. If you (speaking to the gals) were found to be very attractive/sexy/sexual to men but had no kind of skill or education. Lived paycheck to paycheck at menial jobs and one day a very rich, yet unattractive and older and otherwise not your type, began to pay you all sorts of attention and flaunt his wealth with you. Would you allow yourself to be his "eye candy" or "kept woman"? Add into the mix children to care for... would you then?
When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser. Socrates I guess I must have a ego problem because it wouldn't bother me if she was with me just for the money. I think a beatiful woman is like beautiful art , it should be charished and if its hanging an my arm What a turn on. If both parties understand then it will only last as long as both people are getting something out of it and noone gets hurt.
Surely there must be some MALE gold diggers out there?? The term gold diggers is always used to refer to females....maybe we just don't make enough money to have gorgeous men latching themselves onto us....I suppose the nearest you get to that is a 'toy boy'....hmm....
Realistically, I have no problem as long as she's fair about it too.
I'm there for the sex (also prestige), she's there for the money. That's an honest trade, probably more honest than many conventional relationships. She's providing a service, it's only fair that she get her payment also.
Most men with money don't care that they weren't blessed with looks. Every man knows that by and large women don't go for looks alone. A short, fat, bald, rich man will probably do ok.
Successful men find success through self-belief and endeavour, privilege, or natural talent - any of which can be attractive to women irrespective of looks. These men soon realise that looks are irrelevant - but it won't stop them spending big on designer suits.
Those that are successful but still hung up on their looks usually have no problem paying large for sex
Personally - I am gorgeous and charming and intelligent - so I can't really offer you any insight on your original request. Sorry.
Warning: The opinions above are those of an anonymous individual on the internet. They are opinions, unless they're facts. They may be ill-informed, out of touch with reality or just plain stupid. They may contain traces of irony. If reading these opinions causes you to be become outraged or you start displaying the symptoms of outrage, stop reading them immediately. If symptoms persist, consult a psychiatrist.
Why not read some stories instead
NEW! Want a quick read for your coffee break? Why not try this... Flash Erotica: Scrubber I like expensive thing and guys with money. It doesn't mean I'm a goldigger everyone. It means I like to be compatible with my mate.
ROFL! if anything, its a poor reflection on the woman who uses her body to get money...aren't they called prostitutes?
As for the question- coming from a guy who does NOT have the looks, hell yeah. I'll pay for it. And considering the fact that prostitution brings in billions each year, my guess is the majority of men would pay as well...
Speaking of love, do you think it's possible for a man/woman in this situation (in either position of the hottie and the moneybags) to fall in love? We all know of couples where one spouse is much more attractive than the other. Russell Brand and Katy Perry come to mind. Might the gold digger and gold diggee get past those roles and become truly commited to one another in deep love? We also know of many beautiful couples that don't make it together. Could the offer of what the other presents bring them happiness. Can the not-well-to-do attractive person who went into it for the money find he/she love the money man/woman? Just wondering.
When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser. Socrates I think in a way it's sad that an old chap, who might have worked hard all his life to get to where he is, would sacrifice genuine love for a young piece of meat (because that's all it would be). I find it hard to imagine getting kicks out of having a young lady screw her nose up while sucking my wrinkled up, 90-year-old semi-erect penis or having a distant, blank look on her face while riding it, or struggling against the pain of my arthritic fingers trying to keep up with her. Not overly sexy in my opinion.
At that age, I wouldn't think sex is a high priority. Therefore I think I would go with someone who I cared about, who cared about me for who I was and and just hope like fuck she doesn't get alzheimer's or dementia.
Porn's always cheaper anyway.