Are you circumcised? Do you prefer it? If the cock wasn't circumcised would you bother?
well i am not circumcxised
Is this a question? A poll? What's going on with this thread?
You can't really drop a one word question with no post and expect to get a thorough or accurate range of answers. What is it you'd like to know about circumcision?
I'm circumcised. The thought of not being seems weird to me. I can only imagine that the inside gets kind of nasty from time to time for those who are not.
I am and had high prise from the ladies
I am, yes. I think it is fine and honestly would not want to not be.
As a female, may I speak from a spectators point of view, particularly as men usually only get to see one cock - their own - whereas I have seen many. I prefer to see and hold and suck a circumcised cock which to my mind is altogether more hygienic and pleasant to look at than all those rolls of foreskin Plus I find a circumcised man can last much longer before nature makes him ejaculate.
Problem is, in England few men are circumcised except for the Jewish population, so in past times I've had to forsake the luxuries of having a circumcised guy. Fortunately, my present b/f is cut and I'm hoping his circumcised cock will be the only one I'm ever likely to see in the future.
Debates on this go nowhere, but may I still point out that the hygiene argument is inherently fucked. If you use being circumcised as an excuse to not wash your genitals, then you're not hygienic, are you?
Plus I wouldn't want to imagine having to lube myself up every time I want to masturbate. How does masturbation even work without foreskin, I will never know.
Of course, if you want to get oral sex then you had better keep your package clean. It's no rocket science, but not everyone seems to get that. And I doubt that's got much to do with circumcision. Regarding women's perceptions, it also depends on where you ask the question; most women in Europe will find circumcised penises strange, while the opposite may be true for America. I'm not sure why it's a big deal because they look exactly the same when erect, that is most of the time when women come in contact with them.
Don't remember if I read it, or if it was In some Class ("Circumcision reduces the chances of contracting STDs') So do rubbers!As for the question .YES some time ago..
I most times don't need to lubricate to masturbate. In fact most times I don't. I enjoy dry masturbation the best esp. since I precum a lot.
As to the thing of all cocks looking a like when hard, I have been with several uncut men in my lifetime and several of them when even erect still had enough skin you couldn't see the head of the cock.
And yes I have seen both types of cock where the owner was more hygenic than another. Had nothing to do with whether they were cut or uncut.
Everybody has their own technique for masturbating anyway whether they are cut or uncut...
over the years i have discussed with a number of women they all say much the same uncut lmore fun for playing and handjobs cut got the vote for oral intercourse didnt make much difference this is about 12 mature women one didnt know the difference greatfun explaining ! i am cut
I was circumcised when I was very young, before I can remember. In fact, I've never seen an uncut cock in the flesh. I've seen very few dicks at all (most of them at a local production of Hair). I don't have a particular preference in cut v. uncut in guy partners, and if I ever have boys, I would consider leaving them uncut. After all, I think it's their decision more than it is mine.
Yes I am. But I wouldn't recommend anyone getting it done now. I was clipped as a baby and didn't walk for a year afterwards.