Recommended Reads: Amy's Mom (NEW!) | Dick Job I Pork by Northwest
Top stories: Skiing with Keith and Kate | The Reunion | Lewd Beach | A Hole New World
Newest: Midlife Resurgence: Piñas Coladas
Series: Summer Cockbuster | Midlife Renewal | It's A Date | Becoming A Man | Contagion
Quote by Jam_Wil_MacI don't see it quite that way. There are analogs between male and female parts.
Absolutely not. I am proud to have a foreskin.
I believe circumcision for anything other than medical purposes amounts to genital mutilation, no better than the religious and ethnic FGM that has taken place in Africa.
Recommended Reads: Amy's Mom (NEW!) | Dick Job I Pork by Northwest
Top stories: Skiing with Keith and Kate | The Reunion | Lewd Beach | A Hole New World
Newest: Midlife Resurgence: Piñas Coladas
Series: Summer Cockbuster | Midlife Renewal | It's A Date | Becoming A Man | Contagion
Quote by joe71
I don't see it quite that way. There are analogs between male and female parts.
Male circumcision is akin to labiectomies that (sadly) I hear are starting to become more common practice among plastic surgeons. Unfortunate perhaps, but not extremely damaging to a person's sexuality.
FGM as widely practiced (including clitoral removal) is analogous to removing the head of the penis. That is highly damaging to a person's sexuality.
Quote by Jam_Wil_Mac
But the entire point of religious circumcision is to reduce sensitivity and make sex less pleasurable and purely an act for God (or whomever) and not an act of list. Outside of medical necessity, circumcision would never have existed had it not been for religious zealousness. The fact that many, many boys are circumcised before it is their choice is abhorrent.