I never had sex with more than one guy at the time (and never with a girl), so I dunno about reality. But the thought makes me hot.
no not really , whether it be male or female. if i decide to be with two people i don't want them to be exactly alike. the whole purpose of a threesome is the variety
and differences of their bodies.
No because that would be and illegal and against God. That's about the only kind of sex I haven't had yet (and I never would). Well unless maybe they were just pretending to be brothers but even then I'm pretty sure it would be wrong.
Besides I'm just like slutpuppie. I like the variety in different bodies and different kinds of dick.
Twins might be interesting, but I much prefer to be with 2 different people. Love differences in body type, scents, they way they move, everything!!
Its never occured to me, so no
I’ve been with twins in college one at a time but I didn’t know it at first. It took a week to figure out I was doing 2 different guys.
Twins? That sounds really kinky. I don't know why two twins would want to have sex with the same woman at the same time. I wouldn't want to fuck someone with my sister. Yuk!
I AM a twin, and I've never had any compelling desire to be with twins, although my brother-in-law had a weird obsession about having sex with me so he'd be the only man to have had sex with both the Frasier twins.
Just because they are twins?
No!
The question seems to presume male twins, which the answers reflect. Speaking for the other side of the street, I would not be adverse to sharing time with twin sisters. I think the physical desires and dynamics are fundamentally different. That said, I also think there would be the risk of a basic imbalance to the triad, a feeling of restraint, unless the twins embraced intimacy with each other. It should be noted that consensual, non-coercive relations between same-sex sibling of legal age is not considered " " in many countries and US states (where we have no federal laws one way or the other) and is considered legal. Where it is not, the prohibition is based entirely on invented moral mumbo-jumbo, since there is no biological danger involved.