As a scientist I have been wondering about how one might measure the quality of a story or poem.
There seem to be only four criteria:
1. Number of reads - quantitative
2. Number of scores - quantitative
3. Average score - quantitative
4. Comments - qualitative
To maintain the high quality of Lush, it might be that stories and poems should be removed after a decent interval of time, say 9 months if they failed any of these criteria:
1. Fewer than 3,000 reads for a story or 100 reads for a poem
2. Fewer than 30 scores for a story or 10 scores for a poem
3. Average score below 4
Another suggestion could be that there should be two ways of scoring each story or poem:
1. Quality of the writing
2. Level of eroticism
I realise that if a quality control system were imposed most of my stories and poems would be removed, which might be a reflection of their quality, but I would still be interested in other authors views on this topic.
There are only the loosest of grammar controls present on any of the other free erotica sites out there. Lush already has the strongest quality control system there is, and undoubtedly the strongest anti-plagiarism system of any other site. Lush is the only one I know of that regularly stops such stories before they see publication.
Asking for anything more from a free site ( at least as far as posting/reading stories are concerned ) is asking a lot.
And automated controls of the type you're suggesting are rife with potential to eradicate excellent stories that only lack in mass appeal.
I was posing a hypothetical question rather than my personal view - which is typical of the way scientists think and work. I agree with both Daddysweetheart and RejectReaity who both make excellent points.
writing is actually not a science. too bad. I always wanted to be Doctor Sprite, PhD. *sighs*
You can’t truly call yourself peaceful unless you are capable of violence. If you’re not capable of violence, you’re not peaceful. You’re harmless.
Lush is a site for amateur writers to grow and develop their abilities. I think we currently have a much better site and system than any of the competition does. I really think seriously changing what already works would be detrimental. If its working, don't fix it.
The popularity of the site, massive numbers of story views and our ever growing number of story and poem submissions are proof that Lushstories is doing a great job as it is. I'm very happy with it.
This idea seems really strange. I know I have a few favorite poems that are not that popular. But to me they are sensational.
This is people's art.
Seems silly.
Hugs,
Mysteria
Xo
"insensitive prick!" – Danielle Algo
You seem to imply that quality of poems/stories is something purely objective. I think it's far from, and that the way stories/poems are judged for their quality can change over time. By readers giving scores/comments on the works you have some meta data for which to filter for those deemed to have the best quality, without the need to lose some of your source material.
BTW, I don't really see why avarage score is quantitative and comments are qualitative? Is it because the scores are numbers (but which could also stand for bad, poor, avarage, good and excellent) or is it because it's an avarage score?
=== Not ALL LIVES MATTER until BLACK LIVES MATTER ===
Page hits don't equate to reading the whole story or poem. I'm sure the number of 'reads' is actually more indicative of how well a title or one-liner grabs the curiosity. Once it does, the page click registers as a read, but probably only a fraction of that count are actually people who wind up reading the whole story. Many will try a few lines, or do a casual perusal, and then get bored and move on. Trying to quantify story/poem quality by the number of 'reads' is pretty meaningless.
Dr. Sprite is right. Writing is an art, not a science, otherwise computers would be writing best-sellers. Lush is fine the way it is. Applying science to quantify art never yields favorable results.
"I have come, I have seen and written." Without a doubt Lush has proved the best. The more I write, the more I become polished. It's due to the mods that have made me wax my mistakes. There are no easy roads if one is just wishing to write a poem or story with no streets or suburbs befitting. "Sometimes quality is in the eye of the reader." What one sees as emeralds. the other may view as dismal.
First of all - my apologies to every one that I have pissed off, which is almost everybody. Just put it down to pre senile dementia. Elizabeth said I should say I was just a bit touched by the sun, but those of you who know anything about Manchester would know that water on the brain would be more likely. I will now go and crawl into a big hole in the ground for a few months, unless someone can come up with a suitable penance.
Count me in the "not pissed" column.
A story, in any genre, is good if it sparks your sense of wonder, curiosity, imagination or moves you in any way. Big or small.
Trying to apply theory or numbers to that is silly.