Join the best erotica focused adult social network now
Login

How much emphasis do you place on your story's readability?

last reply
17 replies
1.9k views
0 watchers
0 likes
I will be the first to admit that I prefer the writing style of some authors because their stories are easier to read and understand than others. Sometimes I have left a book unfinished because it was just too tiresome to wallow through the complexity of the language or because the plot was too complex, for example. At other times I have trudged on, patiently deciphering the language and flipping back to previous pages, trying desperately to remember which character said or did something, or what happened before. My worst nightmare is stories with more than two or three characters because I'm useless at remembering which character details belong to which character.

To be perfectly honest, I'm mostly a lazy reader. If I quickly find that I'm not understanding much without having to put in a lot of effort, I am less likely to continue reading and make a mental note not to read more from that author. Even if I do complete complete a difficult read and find that I have mostly enjoyed it, I would be hesitant to read more from that author.

When I'm writing, on the other hand, I write in a style that I would like to read and understand. Now, before somebody says that my stories are as reading Jack and Jill, I already know this. However, not everybody here writes in the same style, with some using more complex language and plots than others.

My question is whether you place any emphasis on readability, or do you just write in a style that you like? Perhaps you do both.
Readability is paramount. When I write, I do my best to ensure that it doesn't wander or digress from the story. I know that once a reader begins to feel the urge to. Skip ahead, I've lost them completely.

I make sure that any changes that take place are segued so that the reader can follow it. I try to keep each paragraph interesting and relevant to the story. I have ripped entire sections of good writing from stories because they drifted away from the point, and I try to limit the number of characters so that the reader doesn't become lost. How you name them helps as well. Having characters with similar names is inviting confusion.

This, to me is the single most important trick to good writing. Keep it moving and don't give the reader pause to stop reading. That way, the story concludes before they realize it's over.
Quote by GirlyWorld
I will be the first to admit that I prefer the writing style of some authors because their stories are easier to read and understand than others. Sometimes I have left a book unfinished because it was just too tiresome to wallow through the complexity of the language or because the plot was too complex, for example. At other times I have trudged on, patiently deciphering the language and flipping back to previous pages, trying desperately to remember which character said or did something, or what happened before. My worst nightmare is stories with more than two or three characters because I'm useless at remembering which character details belong to which character.

To be perfectly honest, I'm mostly a lazy reader. If I quickly find that I'm not understanding much without having to put in a lot of effort, I am less likely to continue reading and make a mental note not to read more from that author. Even if I do complete complete a difficult read and find that I have mostly enjoyed it, I would be hesitant to read more from that author.

When I'm writing, on the other hand, I write in a style that I would like to read and understand. Now, before somebody says that my stories are as reading Jack and Jill, I already know this. However, not everybody here writes in the same style, with some using more complex language and plots than others.

My question is whether you place any emphasis on readability, or do you just write in a style that you like? Perhaps you do both.


same pinch!!!!!!!!
I'm a selfish writer.

I am much more interested in how much I enjoy writing it than how much other will enjoy reading it. Sometimes my writing is full of overly complex phrases and long sentences with multiple clauses that are hard to follow—call it an indulgence of mine.

That's not to say that I don't consider readability at all. Of course I want people to want to read my stories, but it's not as important as having written something that I took the greatest pleasure in writing, and sometimes that means sacrificing a degree of readability.

Reading my stories is hard work at times, and I apologise for that, but I'm not likely to change any time soon because I've never yet been disappointed by the reception those stories that I have truly enjoyed writing have received.
I don't care. I just need to get this crap out of my head.
Absolutely of paramount importance to me. I wouldn't finish reading a story that jumped around, was rife with grammatical, tense and spelling errors, or otherwise left me thinking about the APA Style Guide instead of the story itself....why would I subject my (wonderful) readers to such nonsense?
Want to spend some time wallowing in a Recommended Read? Pick one! Or two! Or seven!

I write my stories based on what I'm feeling, who I'm basing the story on, who I'm writing it to. But, having said that, if I publish it then I want it to be read and enjoyed. So I write for me, but want others to like them, otherwise I wouldn't bother publishing them. If I publish them, I want them to be readable.
Quote by GirlyWorld
I will be the first to admit that I prefer the writing style of some authors because their stories are easier to read and understand than others. Sometimes I have left a book unfinished because it was just too tiresome to wallow through the complexity of the language or because the plot was too complex, for example. At other times I have trudged on, patiently deciphering the language and flipping back to previous pages, trying desperately to remember which character said or did something, or what happened before. My worst nightmare is stories with more than two or three characters because I'm useless at remembering which character details belong to which character.

To be perfectly honest, I'm mostly a lazy reader. If I quickly find that I'm not understanding much without having to put in a lot of effort, I am less likely to continue reading and make a mental note not to read more from that author. Even if I do complete complete a difficult read and find that I have mostly enjoyed it, I would be hesitant to read more from that author.

When I'm writing, on the other hand, I write in a style that I would like to read and understand. Now, before somebody says that my stories are as reading Jack and Jill, I already know this. However, not everybody here writes in the same style, with some using more complex language and plots than others.

My question is whether you place any emphasis on readability, or do you just write in a style that you like? Perhaps you do both.


I don't think it's lazy reading, here. I think this is what a lot of readers struggle with. This is, in fact, part of why a large portion of the US population says they do not read at all: it's a challenge. That's not necessarily because of *them* - it has a lot to do with modern storytelling overlooking some essential foundations of writing.

I bet you that if you cared - if you were entralled 100% by the story and the characters, you wouldn't mind. (It already sounds like you'll read on if the story's vocabulary is complicated which is evidence of this).

--

Now per an over abundance of characters:

Some authors just don't know when to quit. They have a hard time culling down the story's cast to just a few essential characters. Doesn't mean they can't have 50 people in the story: but you should have you *main* characters that get a wealth of attention and page time, and everyone else is secondary.

I edited a murder mystery novel for a friend last year and in the first chapter alone he had introduced 15 people. They were having a meeting at the precinct before going out on a raid. Not just with references to names, but backstory on all the characters - or some sort of excessive descriptions that didn't help the reader at all.

That is too much.

By flooding the viewer/reader with too much too quickly the author will only confuse a lot of people in the process.

--

I bet you that if the characters are introduced in a way where *who they are* becomes familiar before bringing in another character - then you'll be fine. (In ch 1 meet 2 people - later add a 3rd - then a 4th - etc).

--

Other problems you're likely getting thrown off by:

Poor transitions, poor point of view jumps, poor characterization.

If the writer jumps too quickly between characters - it can be confusing.
If they're not clear, when they switch from one character to the next - then it can be confusing.
If the characters are not written as 'individuals' - with little difference between one character to the next - then they will all start to sound the same - and be confusing.

--

There are a lot of things that writers can learn and do to minimize confusion - so many elements that need to be balanced properly from accurate descriptions to engaging the reader on a more personal level before bringing in someone knew. Etc.

These days - with a flood of self-published works hitting the book market that have had little to no feedback - it's easier to come across works tht are just overall poorly crafted. Maybe the concept is great, the quality as in grammar and spelling is spot on, but the more complicated stuff needs a lot of work.

--

When I write - I aim for clarity. I re-introduce characters if it's been a while. I describe events and people at various points throughout the story so I'm not just relying on the reader's memory. I reference back so the reader doesn't have to.

The hard work is on me - reading should be a matter of putting your feet up and sinking into the story with little effort.

My story ideas can get complicated: theological, philosophical. But above all: my goal is to write it so most readers will still enjoy it and get it.

[The Devil's Undertones is a series - with just the first book so far - that is a very heavy religious allegory underneath. But on the surface it's a spicy erotica. The idea is that if people don't CARE about religious allegory (most people don't), don't get it (most people don't), they don't HAVE to in order to fully enjoy the story. They can read and have the story that's written on the page unfold.]
There's no point in me writing it if you can't read it.
Quote by BethanyFrasier
There's no point in me writing it if you can't read it.

Yep. If I'm writing exclusively to please myself, that's called a "journal," not a "story."
Precision in language is important in my work and this carries over to my creative writing. I agonize to find exactly the right words to express what I want to say, and, with English being such a rich, nuanced language, there are always many choices. I try to write in a straightforward way without convoluted sentences or florid over-the-top language. I hope that all of this makes my work easily readable.

There are two other elements to my writing: character development and description. Characters should come across as believable people, not one-dimensional pawns moving about your story. Their traits can be revealed through the telling of the story rather than all in a single paragraph. Description,whether of a place, a meal, a painting, or anything else is paramount in capturing your reader's imagination. I generally write about things that I know and have experienced and use my sense memory to construct images and descriptions that (hopefully) bring the reader right there. Sometimes a phrase will come to you that encapsulates what you saw, felt, or heard and you know that it will resonate with your reader.

Editing carefully is crucial to readability as well. Other than catching typos and other errors, you can check for repetitive use of words, inconsistencies,and the flow of your story. Even dividing your prose into paragraphs of a reasonable length makes your story more readable.

In the end, other than expressing ourselves, captivating the reader is the goal when we write.
I prefer a conversation style of writing, in both reading and writing. I think some authors like to impress you with their wide range of vocabulary. Eg. "With his trim physique and slender long lines, Troy's friend Chris is certainly very eumorphous." (Well built.)
Most newspapers are written on something like a 4th or 5th grade reading level. Ernest Hemingway wrote books on an 8th grade reading level. William Faulkner wrote his books on a college reading level. Hemingway's books sold many more copies, while William Faulkner garnered Pulitzer prizes and critical acclaim by university professors. Hemingway is ultimately much more famous and has had his books read by many more people.

In college I could read Hemingway almost three times faster than Faulkner. Though reading Faulkner was enjoyable, in no way was it more fun than reading Hemingway.

Most New York Times best sellers are written on a level where the masses can read and enjoy them.

I try to write stories so that most people can enjoy reading them. The fact that a lot of people can have a really good time reading my stories is thrilling to me. As just a very regular guy, I am not interested in trying to make readers think I am a great intellectual. I'd rather they focus on the story and thoroughly enjoy it.

I always hope the fun I had writing comes through for the reader.
i try not to write words that have more than one sill a bull in them.

You can’t truly call yourself peaceful unless you are capable of violence. If you’re not capable of violence, you’re not peaceful. You’re harmless.

Quote by BethanyFrasier
There's no point in me writing it if you can't read it.


actually, there is, but it's not the point i think you're going for.

You can’t truly call yourself peaceful unless you are capable of violence. If you’re not capable of violence, you’re not peaceful. You’re harmless.

Thanks very much for all your responses. It has been very insightful, with the majority (I think) placing at least some emphasis on readability, and many who consider it absolutely essential. I've also learned about some elements of readability that I wouldn't have otherwise thought about. Great stuff!!
Quote by BethanyFrasier
There's no point in me writing it if you can't read it.

Pretty much my response as well.

As much as I love writing it is pretty pointless if your audience can't read it