Obviously it is a man whose wife has sex with other men. But is that enough? Is a man cuckold with a wife cheating behind his back, or if they have an open relationship or are swingers.
Must he in addition know and be sexually aroused by her actions?
Must there in addition be a moment of humiliation, of the wife taking negatively about his sexual abilities and denying or restricting his sex with her?
Or must there also be a "bull" in the picture, another man taking control of the wife's sexual life, before you call the husband a cuckold?
I have no problem with understanding the acceptation and even excitement of knowing my wife might get good sexual experiences with other men, but it would have to be full openness and on the condition that our relationship was the primary and most important. If my wife went into humiliating me, or started a relationship with a "bull", our marriage would end. (None of above will ever happen)
Would the other men here be aroused by their wife having sex with others, or accept a humiliating or "bull" controlled relationship?
Are there women here who get excited about their men beeing with other women? What would be the name for that?
Well humiliation is involved if one of the people are turned on by it but I'd image there wouldn't be any if one disliked it.
Even though a woman is going out and having sex with other guys, with or with the husband/boyfriend watching, I can image it'd feel good to know that even if these men are better than him in bed, his woman is still with him, that she still chooses him over those other men despite what they may have that he lacks. I mean...I'd never be in a cuckholding relationship but I don't really mind it, I don't think it's wrong if it isn't hurting anyone.
In the grand order of things, does it matter?
Thanks for explaining that.. I was curious too. It's kind of a funny word
If I may ask the stupid question...
I'm all over the fantasy, and I understand the definition. But what I'm unclear on is the distinction between the Cuckold and Wife Lovers categories here on Lush. What's the line in the sand?
Mazza's posts notwithstanding, I'm guessing the knowledge of the husband is the deciding factor - he knows, it's a Cuckold, he doesn't, it's a Wife Lovers story.
I've got a few in the queue and I just don't know where to put them.
My latest story is a racy little piece about what happens when someone cute from work invites you over to watch Netflix and Chill. Ultimately, a CUCKOLD doesn't LIKE what goes on. (Or may be simply unaware of it.) Though others are, this shaming him, even if he is unaware.
xx SF
(By classic definition.)
I think Elling50 has it best, although Mazza is correct in giving the dictionary definition. The difference with the Loving Wives type of story is not about whether or not the husband is aware of or participates in his wife's infidelity, but in the added element of cruelty and humiliation that is implicit in a Cuckolding story. It is implicit, it seems to me, that the husband is in some way sexually inadequate, and that deep down his weft despises him for it, and wishes only to have sex with a strong and sexually dominant male, even if she is dominant in the marital relationship. There should be more than just reluctance on the husband's part, but also a sense of rejection and emasculation - it is in essence a form of psychological castration. Sharing in the sexual joy of one's wife, even if it is with another man or woman is something completely different. Some people will like Cuckolding stories, others will not - by having separate categories The editors have allowed readers to make their own choice.
This is good question. I know what the word means. It has to do with when a predatory animal replaces the eggs of prey animal with its own. And the prey animal then incubates the other animal's offspring. So I don't know why their is a category call this in the list of story categories. I don't get it. The words is an old school word. It comes from a bird that used this tactic. Try to guess its name. It is not used any more and you may not find it in the dictionary. Regarding humans it means when a man raises a child as his own without the knowedlge that the child is not his, believing the whole time he had part in making that child.
