So I'd say, so what? We're not Urk and Gurk and we don't live in a cave. We're together because we want to be, and actually that has very little to do with sex.
Muesli with yoghurt and coffee. Is that too boring to mention?
Bryan Ferry - Slave to Love
While Titian was mixing rose madder
His model reclined on a ladder.
Her position, to Titian, suggested coition;
So he ran up the ladder
And 'ad 'er
If you're writing erotic material it certainly helps.
A necessary evil in many instances, agreed.
I think it is, but in the decorative sexually alluring form. There's nothing sexier than a little, manicured, patch of come-on hair, on either sex. Totally shaved (or waxed or lasered) doesn't really do it for me. I don't see the full beaver making a return generally, though it remains the popular form in much of Asia.
If the relationship is sound and based on more than just sex and residual caveman genes, why should you not? I don't get this hang-up about being "cheated on". Sounds antediluvian to me. Unless you think you "own" your partner (and you shouldn't) where's the point in getting uptight about something you were never going to be invited to anyway?
Fabulous. And very hot. I've never met a woman who has tried to tell me she doesn't masturbate.
I think the Caveman gene is fading. It's true that men cheat - but more and more women do too. Sex is recreational as well as procreational. It's probably time we all got used to that factor. And redefined "cheating" too.
A big smile and a wet pussy
Like everything else, this is really a question of preference and choice. It works if agreed parameters are not breached.
I think everyone cheats in their mind. Actually doing so is a common occurrence. The problem is that it is defined by the "ownership" thing. But no one owns any other person and shouldn't want to. That's servitude. People make compacts and I think most try to keep them. There seems little sense in feeling aggrieved over some casual sexual liaison between two other people that (quite naturally) excludes oneself. You're with someone because you want to be with them. Isn't that enough? A couple relationship of genuine value should be robust enough to withstand what is still, incomprehensibly, defined as "straying".
Stay-ups are best. They look great and they roll off without delay when required to do so.
Stay-ups are best. They look great and they roll off without delay when required to do so.
Yes. If what you're writing doesn't turn you on, why should it turn on any other reader?
No. More fun with someone you've taken the time to get to know, even if only barely (I love a pun)
No. More fun with someone you've taken the time to get to know, even if only barely (I love a pun)
Of course. I have the hottest fantasies when I'm doing myself. The hot coming is delicious.
What's wrong with pawn on a gender basis that should create negative feelings in men about women watching it? Shouldn't we all be rather over all this by now?
A Thousand Words by Savage Garden