Join the best erotica focused adult social network now
Login

Your thoughts on these type of pics?

last reply
12 replies
1.2k views
0 watchers
0 likes
Lurker
My apologies, i cant come up with a name for them.. The half and half type, one showing the girl, and it's always a girl, in a wedding dress, attached to another of her performing a sex act. Surely these are at the least private?
I see a lot in the pic rooms, always posted by the same person i may add. One could argue that if the person in the image chose to put her pics online, then they are there to be seen. But, we can't be sure that they are meant for public consumption. Maybe they are stolen.

https://thumb-p7.xhcdn.com/a/eB0stgkCJaIOY4PgRlAU0g/000/084/788/677_1000.jpg
https://thumb-p8.xhcdn.com/a/R8vdsyHqkEqPeMfdy1pbGw/000/084/788/678_1000.jpg

Cheers
Anna
I first ran across some of these type pics searching for my favorites "Underwater Nudes" or "Fit Nudes" on Bing Images. It seems they always slip in some "other than" pics that have nothing to do with the seach wording. Anyway they usually fall under "Wife dress undressed" (or girlfriend or bride dressed undressed) sometimes tagged with "swinging, fucking, sucking" or something similar. They usually fall under swinging sites or other various porn sites such as XHamster or Wifebucket.

Hope that helps.
I couldn't careless for them.

I've never Googled for these types of images.


Wouldn't want to see them again.
Lurker
Quote by JackStay
I first ran across some of these type pics searching for my favorites "Underwater Nudes" or "Fit Nudes" on Bing Images. It seems they always slip in some "other than" pics that have nothing to do with the seach wording. Anyway they usually fall under "Wife dress undressed" (or girlfriend or bride dressed undressed) sometimes tagged with "swinging, fucking, sucking" or something similar. They usually fall under swinging sites or other various porn sites such as XHamster or Wifebucket.

Hope that helps.


Cheers, but perhaps I didn't make myself clear. I wasn't wanting to know the naming terms. I wouldn't want my future wedding images to be used in such a way. I feel it's a massive disrespect to the person represented.
Quote by AnnaDurhamUK


Cheers, but perhaps I didn't make myself clear. I wasn't wanting to know the naming terms. I wouldn't want my future wedding images to be used in such a way. I feel it's a massive disrespect to the person represented.


Hey AnnaDurhamUk, I understood what you were asking. I was attempting to come at the question for a different angle by pointing out these type pictures have become quite prevalent on the internet. And yes, I feel if the party whose picture had been posted had not given permission it is not only extremely disrespectful, it's probably illegal. And like you I would be quite incensed if it happened to us. I would never post something like this even if I had permission to do so.

However, there are people who have no problem with it and if both parties have agreed, they are of legal age and meet the website's terms for posting these type pictures; then it's "different strokes for different folks". Probably some day in the future they'll wish otherwise though.

Take care, stay safe and stay healthy!
"insensitive prick!" – Danielle Algo
Quote by AnnaDurhamUK
Cheers, but perhaps I didn't make myself clear. I wasn't wanting to know the naming terms. I wouldn't want my future wedding images to be used in such a way. I feel it's a massive disrespect to the person represented.


Lush has forum threads/groups dedicated to sharing pics of members' wives (and there too many of the pics are posted by the same member). Whether those wives agree with their pictures being posted we don't know. If not then that's problematic too.


===  Not ALL LIVES MATTER until BLACK LIVES MATTER  ===

Active Ink Slinger
These pictures creep me out. It's almost like the dressed version confirms who the girl is. I feel like this is five minutes away from being revenge porn.
Active Ink Slinger
It's hard to determine consent to uploads.

Maybe if there was a pic of her holding a sign saying, "I consent to uploads of these pics."
Trust people to be themselves...
Quote by purplmunky
These pictures creep me out. It's almost like the dressed version confirms who the girl is. I feel like this is five minutes away from being revenge porn.


Exactly.

I always associate these types of pics with revenge porn.

My last published story: Good For Nothing

Lurker
Those "action" photos always make me wonder about who took the photo and why were they standing there with a camera in their hand.
Active Ink Slinger
Quote by CarltonStJames


Exactly.

I always associate these types of pics with revenge porn.


Definitely the vibe I got from these too. I'm sure there's couples with fetish of "wedding night porn" or "newlywed porn" out there, but revenge porn -sadly- seems at least equally likely.

"The Punished Nonpartisan" <- Extreme BDSM and humiliation story. Heavy on plot. Served on a plate of political drama with a side of domestic terror. Currently Free download.

Jocelyn the Wicked <- futanari, fantasy fan fic, and some tentacles that escaped the laboratory

Active Ink Slinger
Quote by noll


Lush has forum threads/groups dedicated to sharing pics of members' wives (and there too many of the pics are posted by the same member). Whether those wives agree with their pictures being posted we don't know. If not then that's problematic too.



It would seem like after 10,20 or more of the same wife, mostly in the same pose or similar underwear, that the poster would get the idea that we've seen, enjoyed, and now, moved on. I don't really bother spending much time on photos that are copped from other commercial sources. In a relatively free environment I think we have to be really open to whatever someone thinks is a valued posting. Does get repetitive real fast though.
Active Ink Slinger
I would have thought there were other things to occupy you on your wedding night rather than filming the event.