Quote by chefkathleen
That do that in movies too. The double standard. If I guy shows full frontal it's a hard R rating or an X. If a girl does it, it will get an R but no one bats an eye about it. Look at the talk about Boogie Nights and Gladiator.
Quote by MrNudiePants
As a nudist, I've been naked in public places quite often, and usually surrounded by other naked people. For me, seeing another guy's dick does nothing for me, or to me. If you ever HAVE been in a situation involving social nudity, one of the first things you realize is that nudists tend to focus less on a person's shape, or body protrusions, and more on the person as a whole - when we're chatting, we're actually listening to the other person's words and not trying to figure out what they look like naked - they're already naked!
It's not exactly a related topic, but how exactly would you get into a situation like that?
'Social nudity'... I find it fascinating.
Quote by Maximillion
Also, Gurly Boy, realise that there are similar situations that go both ways. Think about promiscuity. Why is a man who sleeps around called a player, while a woman who sleeps around is called a whore?
I'm sure that with enough searching there would come up dovens of these double standards.
Quote by Maximillion
It's not exactly a related topic, but how exactly would you get into a situation like that?
'Social nudity'... I find it fascinating.
Also, Gurly Boy, realise that there are similar situations that go both ways. Think about promiscuity. Why is a man who sleeps around called a player, while a woman who sleeps around is called a whore?
I'm sure that with enough searching there would come up dovens of these double standards.
It's an interesting topic so allow me to address your topic from a 'purely' dancer's perspective.
From as early as the 60s to as late as the early 90s, seeing a 'mostly nude' male and female dancer on a Paris or Vegas Cabaret stage and performing 'Love Adagios' was not all that unusual. In fact, there were many select Strip Clubs which featured what were called 'Love Dances' between Male Exotic Dancers and Female Exotic Dancers. At both type of venues, paired couples most often performed in g-strings however at a few places the Dancers were required to go full nude.
Today, you would never see such a thing and I bet most of you on this site are far too young to even know such dance acts actually existed?
What changed then? Better yet! Why was the sight of a nude male performing with a nude female so accepted in those previous decades but not today?
For all of today's Progressive posturing and supposed acceptance, it would seem that things back then were much more wide open and free spirited?
This subject interests me as I have worked as a nude photographers model - not porn, and made a comfortable living for a few years in regular employment.
Now as a nudist who visits nude beaches in male company - rarely is any notice taken of nude bodies by other nudists unless there are extremes. Breasts, penis etc.
Sex on nudist beaches here is not tolerated.
In public ‘clothing optional’ venues,(mixed bathing) I have noticed that more interest is taken and comparisons made of the men’s penis than women’s breasts. The interest in the women’s vaginal area is more related to her pubic hair treatment or prominent Labia if they can be seen - more often than not on women who are completely denuded of hair (very prevalent) or reduced to expose that region. Young teenage bare top girls do attract most attention.
A nude very pregnant woman is more often than not seen as a woman of beauty and most other extreme aspects are ignored as breasts and areola can be larger than normal.
The next most commented form is the figure of a woman. Overweight, firm, shapely etc. obviously her breasts will cause comment if they are on the huge side or firm with uplift and perky nipples. Often enhanced to the extreme.
Attractiveness is in the eye of the beholder. Some have preferences for the extreme features others for the firm and shapely form.
As for men it is basically their penis. Rarely is a comment heard of their body unless he is firm and usually extremely well built. Fit. The overweight, flabby and man boobs do cause some comment at times.
I have nude modelled many years ago and although my figure has now become fuller with age and some droop has developed etc I still attract some attention when naked in company and I have no shame in exposing myself, but not sexually. My pubic hair is manicured to a strip which exposes my labia but rarely do I hear it commented upon unless by other women when discussing the shaping of our pubic hair.
More often than not it is my male friends penis’s that is mentioned when I am asked to comment. Neither are anything but normal, circumcised and nothing extreme although are reasonably well endowed. Their pubic hair is trimmed and testicles hairless and can be prominent in warm conditions. Their performance is most satisfactory and again that aspect can be a topic of comment by some women as I am intimate with both as FWB.
I would agree with the opening comment - I cannot see why nude women can be more acceptable than nude males and I can only attribute that to the size of their penis being the “attraction” and the imagination or otherwise of their erection. Possibly younger children devoid of sex education and discussion can also be a concern.
Just more of the double-standard. Maybe because most men enjoy seeing women naked in public while most women don't particularly enjoy seeing naked men in public. I have no shyness at all about being naked in public, but unfortunately, there are very few venues that allow public nudity where I live.
I enjoy being nude, I usually have some naked time each morning.
I do visit a local camp ground that allows nudity. I go to be naked outdoors, naked safely. It is great being around like minded people who are not offended by nudity. It is a pleasure to share my nudity with others and to share there's as well.