Join the best erotica focused adult social network now
Login

If a tree falls... Your theory.

last reply
219 replies
12.0k views
0 watchers
0 likes
Internet Philosopher
0 likes
Quote by BiMale73


I'd say sentience is the ability to sense.

I don't claim anything about whether the tree makes a sound. Like I've said before: it all depends on how you define sound: the perception of it or the potential of it. You clearly claim it's the potential of being heard that makes it sound, and in a normal dialogue that's probably how most people interpret it. I would at least. TheAngryishLover on the other hand says it's the perception what makes it sound, and strictly speaking that may be more correct. The difference doesn't really matter in most conversations and when it does matter it's probably better to speak about audible waves and hearing to make the distinction.

And yes it is indeed semantics. I truly think that that's exactly what the question is about. What is sound? Does it exist outside of the listener or is the listener essential for it to exist?


That's fine, but it makes it and endless circular argument. It's like the term Solar System. Cosmologists use it generically to describe any star system, but one could argue that it only applies to ours as our star is Sol. For Rigel, it would be the Rigel system, or a star system generically. I'm just not gonna try correcting Steven Hawking on the issue.
"insensitive prick!" – Danielle Algo
0 likes
Quote by Milik_the_Red


That's fine, but it makes it and endless circular argument. It's like the term Solar System. Cosmologists use it generically to describe any star system, but one could argue that it only applies to ours as our star is Sol. For Rigel, it would be the Rigel system, or a star system generically. I'm just not gonna try correcting Steven Hawking on the issue.


I don't see why it's an endless circular argument.

Words can have different meanings in different contexts. And that's alright, as long as it's clear what is meant, e.g. solar systems vs our solar system vs its solar system (when talking about Rigel). For cock and pussy, to give it a Lush twist, that's almost always the case. For theory less so.


===  Not ALL LIVES MATTER until BLACK LIVES MATTER  ===

Candy Connoisseur
0 likes
Quote by Dudealicious
I like bacon


Me too Dude. How do you like your eggs? Breakfast sounds far more appealing. Oh, if you leave bacon on the skillet and walk away from from it, will the sound of it crackling as it cooks, stop?
Candy Connoisseur
0 likes
Quote by SydneySider


Me too Dude. How do you like your eggs? Breakfast sounds far more appealing. Oh, if you leave bacon on the skillet and walk away from from it, will the sound of it crackling as it cooks, stop?
In-House Sapiosexual
0 likes
I'm one of those touchy/feely types that the more techie/scientific types abhor.
It's a bit narcissistic to think that something so apathetic would depend on our presence in order to exist.
? A True Story ?
Wild at Heart
0 likes
Quote by avrgblkgrl

I'm one of those touchy/feely types that the more techie/scientific types abhor.
It's a bit narcissistic to think that something so apathetic would depend on our presence in order to exist.


It sounds like when humans thought the sun and everything else revolved around the earth.
In-House Sapiosexual
0 likes
Quote by Magical_felix


It sounds like when humans thought the sun and everything else revolved around the earth.


Exactly.
? A True Story ?
0 likes
Quote by SydneySider


Me too Dude. How do you like your eggs? Breakfast sounds far more appealing. Oh, if you leave bacon on the skillet and walk away from from it, will the sound of it crackling as it cooks, stop?


I really don't discriminate much, I'm an equal opportunity egg lover. Scrambled, poached and over easy I love them all!

As for the sound, the cracklings indefinitely stops the minute you leave the room. Why? Your significant other is eating it behind your back! ?
The night that changed my life, a four part series of a married man lusting after his co-worker

[URL=http://www.lushstories.com/stories/reluctance/the-night-that-changed-my-life-1.aspx][IMG]http://i.imgur.com/WPPsy.jpg[/IMG][/URL]
Active Ink Slinger
0 likes
Quote by trinket
If a tree falls in a forest and nobody is around to hear it, does it still make a noise?

What is your answer and theory behind it?



Well I dont think anybody would know if there was nobody around.
However - I have been camping when a trees have fallen and it can make a variety of sounds from a soft whoosh to a crack and a crash.
They fall when there is no wind or weather to cause it and again when there is a storm.
Usually if there is no weather to cause it it is soft ground and the tree topples from being top heavy or the river bank undermines the roots.
Not sure if this was the answer you were looking for but ......
Lurker
0 likes
Quote by Magical_felix


It sounds like when humans thought the sun and everything else revolved around the earth.


Not really, because that was stupid. Believing that sounds don't exist without the ability to convert vibrations into sound is...science!
Wild at Heart
0 likes
Quote by TheAngryishLover


Not really, because that was stupid. Believing that sounds don't exist without the ability to convert vibrations into sound is...science!


Not to them... They believed it was a fact. In 1,000 years from now someone will probably be saying that what we believe now is stupid too.

And believe me, I get your hang up over the definition of a word... Yes, it is just vibrations until they pass through an ear or a recording device. Ears create "sound" from vibration like eyes create "vision" from patterns of light. I get that... It's just a weird way to think about existence. Weird to me anyway - that nothing exists until I perceive it - but it also makes sense that it really doesn't to me until I perceive it and it doesn't matter wether it was there or not until I did because I wouldn't be the wiser. I think that is what this philosophical thought experiment really is about. If it was about someone trying to understand the definition of the word sound, there is a million simpler ways to go about it than like this.
Gravelly-Voiced Fucker
0 likes
I wish this were original but I heard it on the radio, and it reminded me of this thread.

Irrational numbers, like pi, have an infinite number of decimals but are not repeating, so no one has ever seen the entire number. If no one has ever (and can never) see the number, is it really a number? Does it exist?

Do any numbers truly exist? Or are they all constructs?
Lurker
0 likes
Quote by Magical_felix


Not to them... They believed it was a fact. In 1,000 years from now someone will probably be saying that what we believe now is stupid too.

And believe me, I get your hang up over the definition of a word... Yes, it is just vibrations until they pass through an ear or a recording device. Ears create "sound" from vibration like eyes create "vision" from patterns of light. I get that... It's just a weird way to think about existence. Weird to me anyway - that nothing exists until I perceive it - but it also makes sense that it really doesn't to me until I perceive it and it doesn't matter wether it was there or not until I did because I wouldn't be the wiser. I think that is what this philosophical thought experiment really is about. If it was about someone trying to understand the definition of the word sound, there is a million simpler ways to go about it than like this.


A million more boring way, too!
Lurker
0 likes
Quote by Verbal
I wish this were original but I heard it on the radio, and it reminded me of this thread.

Irrational numbers, like pi, have an infinite number of decimals but are not repeating, so no one has ever seen the entire number. If no one has ever (and can never) see the number, is it really a number? Does it exist?

Do any numbers truly exist? Or are they all constructs?


The understanding of the universe is so vast now, that the top scientists can only describe it in maths

That's brilliant
Rookie Scribe
0 likes
In the manner the question is asked, yes it does and no it doesn't! It's a matter of interpretation of the question.

As any detection device (eg and ear) moves in sympathy with longitudinal air waves, clearly the sound must exist when it is on its way from the tree to the ear as sound moves relatively slowly in air (roughly 700 miles-per-hour) and takes time to get there. The point here is that sound is not spontaneously created simply because it reaches an ear. If there was no sound when the tree fell, there would be nothing for the ear to hear at a later time.

On the other hand, it could be argued that if there was no ear there was no sound.

Consider this though: Sound-waves inter-react with other matter that can be changed or damaged by that sound-wave. This means that all matter might be considered a means of receiving sound (this includes air molecules) so, if all matter is an 'ear' there will always be sound when there is a sound-generating event and a medium (air for example) to transport it.

If you still doubt the above, what breaks a window when a sonic-boom arrives from a distant super-sonic aircraft if no animal (ear) also hears the sound? Is the proposition that, when not heard by an ear, the window isn't really broken? A sonic-boom is sound and the window certainly heard it!

Obviously then, sound-waves (sound) exists whether heard by an ear or not!

If the tree was in a vacuum and not connected to the Earth then, you could argue, there is no sound but, what does it then crash into when it falls? If it strikes the Earth even if there was a vacuum, sound will then travel through the earth. Further, if the tree's own branches crash together as it falls, even in a vacuum and away from the Earth, there is still sound within the matter of the tree. Sorry about that!
Rookie Scribe
0 likes
PS
Number irrationality is a quirk of our method of notation, not the number itself.
Convict
0 likes
Quote by SensuousCosmos
In the manner the question is asked, yes it does and no it doesn't! It's a matter of interpretation of the question.

As any detection device (eg and ear) moves in sympathy with longitudinal air waves, clearly the sound must exist when it is on its way from the tree to the ear as sound moves relatively slowly in air (roughly 700 miles-per-hour) and takes time to get there. The point here is that sound is not spontaneously created simply because it reaches an ear. If there was no sound when the tree fell, there would be nothing for the ear to hear at a later time.

On the other hand, it could be argued that if there was no ear there was no sound.

Consider this though: Sound-waves inter-react with other matter that can be changed or damaged by that sound-wave. This means that all matter might be considered a means of receiving sound (this includes air molecules) so, if all matter is an 'ear' there will always be sound when there is a sound-generating event and a medium (air for example) to transport it.

If you still doubt the above, what breaks a window when a sonic-boom arrives from a distant super-sonic aircraft if no animal (ear) also hears the sound? Is the proposition that, when not heard by an ear, the window isn't really broken? A sonic-boom is sound and the window certainly heard it!


No. It could be that nobody heard something other than a sonic boom break the window.
Active Ink Slinger
0 likes
If we decide to call a flat piece of higly reflective material in a frame a mirror, and record that decision in al the major dictionaries, would you not agree, that a mirror exists, when a flat piece of higly reflective material in a frame exists?

Then why do we need to discuss if sound exists, when
mechanical radiant energy, that is transmitted by longitudinal pressure waves in a material medium, exists? That dear philosophers, is how sound is defined by science, according to a leading dictionary (Merriam-Webster). Other dictionaries use different words, but with the same meaning: sound is a set of waves, traveling through a medium. Merriam-Webster also states, that sound causes hearing. It therefore cannot be, that hearing causes sound.
A little kindness can be so valuable, yet costs almost nothing

In many countries being gay is a crime, and even in modern societies, politicians try to legalise discrimination. Your voice can make a difference. Have a look at All Out to find out how.


Hey... pssst.... that's an l (as in luscious) at the end of my name, not an i
Una chica rubia caliente
0 likes
Quote by Verbal
I wish this were original but I heard it on the radio, and it reminded me of this thread.

Irrational numbers, like pi, have an infinite number of decimals but are not repeating, so no one has ever seen the entire number. If no one has ever (and can never) see the number, is it really a number? Does it exist?

Do any numbers truly exist? Or are they all constructs?


When I think of us together, Verbal darling, the only number that truly exists is eight!
Convict
0 likes
Quote by patokl
If we decide to call a flat piece of higly reflective material in a frame a mirror, and record that decision in al the major dictionaries, would you not agree, that a mirror exists, when a flat piece of higly reflective material in a frame exists?

Then why do we need to discuss if sound exists, when
mechanical radiant energy, that is transmitted by longitudinal pressure waves in a material medium, exists? That dear philosophers, is how sound is defined by science, according to a leading dictionary (Merriam-Webster). Other dictionaries use different words, but with the same meaning: sound is a set of waves, traveling through a medium. Merriam-Webster also states, that sound causes hearing. It therefore cannot be, that hearing causes sound.


My understanding of the quote is we are not asking if sound exists, rather that does that particular sound occur if nobody heard it? "Sound Causes hearing" is not correct. A 100% Hearing impaired person is not going to hear sound at all so Miriam's definition is questionable.
I'm not for everyone
0 likes
Quote by avrgblkgrl

I'm one of those touchy/feely types that the more techie/scientific types abhor.
It's a bit narcissistic to think that something so apathetic would depend on our presence in order to exist.


Agreed, it is more than a bit narcissistic to think that anything would depend on our presence in order to exist.

Math - If my hand was an inch away from, oh, I don't know, a perfect breast with perfect nipple placement. The nipple is pink, on said perfect breast, by the way. Math tells me that I will never be able to touch it. (That would not be sit well with me). Why is math so cruel? Should I try to squeeze that perfect breast with the pink nipple and disregard math's logic? Of course.--------- One inch, or any measure of distance, can be divided in half...for infinity, math claims. Sadly, because of math, it is impossible for my hand to travel an infinite distance to touch a breast.


"insensitive prick!" – Danielle Algo
0 likes
Quote by Magical_felix
Not to them... They believed it was a fact. In 1,000 years from now someone will probably be saying that what we believe now is stupid too.


Hopefully they won't say "stupid", but rather "ignorant". Like we should say about people from the past who were ignorant about the Earth rotating around the Sun (the ones that still believe that are stupid indeed and should know better).

Quote by Magical_felix
And believe me, I get your hang up over the definition of a word... Yes, it is just vibrations until they pass through an ear or a recording device. Ears create "sound" from vibration like eyes create "vision" from patterns of light. I get that... It's just a weird way to think about existence. Weird to me anyway - that nothing exists until I perceive it - but it also makes sense that it really doesn't to me until I perceive it and it doesn't matter wether it was there or not until I did because I wouldn't be the wiser. I think that is what this philosophical thought experiment really is about. If it was about someone trying to understand the definition of the word sound, there is a million simpler ways to go about it than like this.


If one defines sound as the result of hearing and vision as the result of seeing, then that means that sound and vision only exist when perceived, but also that whether they're perceived or not is irrelevant to the existence of those vibrations and light that resulted in those sounds and visions.


===  Not ALL LIVES MATTER until BLACK LIVES MATTER  ===

Active Ink Slinger
0 likes
My 2 cents. The falling tree or the roar of a totally deaf bear makes the sound even when no one hears it. The physics of making the sound does not change because there is no one there to hear it.

Brandie
Rookie Scribe
0 likes
If a tree falls and no-one is there to get squashed by it, that's probably for the best!
Rookie Scribe
0 likes
We cannot write one third completely as a decimal but we can as a fraction. Just because one particular notational system can't entirely describe a number tells us nothing about the number itself just the limitations of that numbering system.

If we have not yet devised a good way to describe certain numbers - so what? Understanding the Universe and all that is in it may take us some time!
Active Ink Slinger
0 likes
Quote by trinket


My understanding of the quote is we are not asking if sound exists, rather that does that particular sound occur if nobody heard it? "Sound Causes hearing" is not correct. A 100% Hearing impaired person is not going to hear sound at all so Miriam's definition is questionable.


The literal text in Merriam-Webster's is: "mechanical radiant energy that is transmitted by longitudinal pressure waves in a material medium (as air) and is the objective cause of hearing". The last part of that definition says, that sound is the cause of hearing. In other words, we can hear, because there is sound.

Edit:
This thread has evolved into a discussion about the existence of sound, when no living being is there to hear it. The original question however, was not about sound, but about noise. The relevant definitions for that in Merriam_Webster are:
a : sound; especially : one that lacks agreeable musical quality or is noticeably unpleasant
b : any sound that is undesired or interferes with one's hearing of something

A sound will always be a sound, but can only be a noise, if there is a living being present to hear it and experience it as either lacking agreeable musical quality, being noticeably unpleasant or undesired or interfering with that being's hearing of something.
So if there is no living being with hearing capabilities present, there still will be sound, but that can not be a noise.
A little kindness can be so valuable, yet costs almost nothing

In many countries being gay is a crime, and even in modern societies, politicians try to legalise discrimination. Your voice can make a difference. Have a look at All Out to find out how.


Hey... pssst.... that's an l (as in luscious) at the end of my name, not an i
Her Royal Spriteness
0 likes
what if... a tree falls in the forest and a deaf person sees it...?

You can’t truly call yourself peaceful unless you are capable of violence. If you’re not capable of violence, you’re not peaceful. You’re harmless.

Unicorn Wrangler
0 likes
Quote by sprite
what if... a tree falls in the forest and a deaf person sees it...?


Clever. They would feel the vibrations of the tree falling so perhaps that counts.