Quote by sprite
Quote by dlcalguy
Quote by lynnwitt
You guys actually save 5 years worth of PMs. do you like... read them too? Like just spend a couple of weeks reading all of them? Or... this is such a strange concept to me, so i'm seriously curious.
Just in an attempt to explain, friends have, over time, sent things I wish to retain - and later be able to find. The two ways are just different use cases. Some conversations are considered ephemeral, true. Others are not. And not every interchange with the same person is on the same topic. The point is not that one would take a marathon reading spree, but that one should be able to locate something of interest when desired.
has been mentioned here. I do not use it, but Trillian, which I do use, seems to be a relatively good analog of the way things are going to work here. its history retention is, for most users, fairly short. Anything one wishes to save must be copied. (Yes, I know about the paid version.) But there is no way of which I know to locate anything in its history.
Of course, then, why bother retaining much of a history - whether here or Trillian - if result will be just a chronological series of un-grouped messages with no way of locating specific topics?
Again, using Trillian as an example, I know how it works and use it with that in mind. The difference here is the loss of existing categorized items in the mass merging which will happen. Of course, I will be diligently copying what I wish to save, but I'd suggest making sure that the user community, especially the longer-term users, are fully aware of the limitations of the new system.