Join the best erotica focused adult social network now
Login

Cut or uncut?

last reply
91 replies
13.5k views
0 watchers
0 likes
I've only been with one uncut guy. Oral was hot with it smile
Either will do.

But must admit the uncut ones smell a lil more fleshy and the cut ones cleaner...know what I mean?

Either way, once its in its in!

Cut ones seem to have wider heads than uncut...true?
Quote by mywife78
Either will do.

But must admit the uncut ones smell a lil more fleshy and the cut ones cleaner...know what I mean?

Either way, once its in its in!

Cut ones seem to have wider heads than uncut...true?


That is just poor hygiene, uncut men who keep themselves clean don't smell any different. I think it is an optical illusion, the extra skin makes the heads appear smaller. I did some breif research and I couldn't find any medical data to support uncut men having narrower heads.
Quote by essence45
Just to throw this in the mix..... Uncut must offer the benefit of both surely? when not in "use" its wrapped in natures perfectly designed protective cover. When inflamed by the sight, touch and thrill of a sensuous partner it wakes itself, draws of its coat and comes out to play with all its nerves and tenderness intact....or is that just mine?? smile


I think that describes the uncut cock perfectly, very well said!
I'm not sure that I can say yay or neigh on this question, as I have never seen/encountered an uncut cock. I would love to experience one--hold it, lick it, suck it, fuck it, stare at its unique form. But, I haven't. The only thing that concerns me about the potentiality of not liking an uncut cock is that I read once that women have a higher chance of developing a UTI while sleeping with an uncut guy. I've had UTI's, and they're terrible. I don't know about you, but I'll pass on the sensation of pissing needles, so, no, I have not come to consensus on this topic.

Thoughts/experiences, ladies?
Quote by meg816
I'm not sure that I can say yay or neigh on this question, as I have never seen/encountered an uncut cock. I would love to experience one--hold it, lick it, suck it, fuck it, stare at its unique form. But, I haven't. The only thing that concerns me about the potentiality of not liking an uncut cock is that I read once that women have a higher chance of developing a UTI while sleeping with an uncut guy. I've had UTI's, and they're terrible. I don't know about you, but I'll pass on the sensation of pissing needles, so, no, I have not come to consensus on this topic.

Thoughts/experiences, ladies?


Again, this comes down to a hygiene issue, an uncut man who keeps himself clean poses no higher risk. If he doesn't then yes, foreskin is a great place for all kinds of nasties to hide. I really feel I must stick up for the uncut men on this one. I have yet to encounter a uncut man with poor hygiene. It is a shame that a few dirty buggers can give them such a nasty reputation.
It doesn't really matter either way, Uncut is very sexy if it's big LOL. Uncut cocks when they are small and flaccid are ugly.
only been with cut ones but would love to try an uncut one sometime
i am trying to figure out why this is important..... it is about the guy the cock is on... and how well he uses it...
The look of an uncut cock has always intrigued me. When I can see an outline of a big head underneath the wrinkly skin I am mesmorized. When it starts to grow anf get hard and the skin starts to retract it's like Christmas. I will say this. I have seen some guys who's foreskin is so tight around the head that even when erect it doesn't retract. To me that would be a shame but they still seem to enjoy sex and won't consider a circumcision.
This must be a cultural thing - I may be wrong on this but uncut are the norm in the UK so am baffled as to the small amount of cut ones reported in this article. As for size the only thing that springs to minds are the spade shaped ones of Austrailian Aborigines they are larger at the head because they've been slit open (ouch).
I have never seen an uncut penis except in a porn movie. So I am guessing most American guys are circumcised. It does seem cleaner. I like cleaner.
definitely cut.
It must be more common overseas. I've only met a few men who are circumcised. It doesn't seem to make any difference. As long as it's clean and it's hard! LOL
Quote by Buz
Cut or uncut could not have anything to do with how long a guy lasts. Mine is cut and I guess they did that before I came home from the hospital after I was born (dam glad I have no memory of it.) I sure wouldn't let anyone go near it now with anything sharp.


Actually mate you might be surpised to here that it does, the foreskin has thousends or nerve endings in it, its extremely sensitive, so you loose some of that if you get cut, which has its advantages and disadvantages. Maybe circumcised people can last a little longer, but you may loose a little overall pleasure. (although there are many other major factors affecting how long you can go, and most of it is in your mindset). Im personally circumcised, far from having complains, ive actually found it better, and some of the girls thought so too. I dont know why, but having a my exposed helmet inside a girl, made me feel like i have more girth, i say that, but i got cut when i was like 12 or 13, so i never had sex while i still had my foreskin, in fact i dont even think i was masturbating at that age, so i know alot about what its like without skin, but not so much with skin, but i wouldnt go back i know that.

Soft tops are the way forward! smile
Sorry to resurrect an old topic, but I created an account just to comment on this. I'm not sure what the worry is about hygiene problems, in this topic and in general. I'm uncut and I've never had any cleanliness issues. I don't need to specifically wash myself when I take my shower and there hasn't ever been a smell or gunk issue or anything. Is this just one of those irrational fears like high schoolers worried they can get pregnant from oral sex?
It doesn't matter to me cut or uncut as long as it's attached to a man and has good hygiene does it really matter
never been with an uncut guy but i'd love to blow one. mmm...

Say. Her. Name.


Circumsized are "cleaner" and look too much better
There have been countless threads on this topic and my answer remains the same; I care more about the man attached to his cock than the look of it alone. I've been with both and I have never found any difference in the way they feel or perform.
I prefer giving head to a cut cock but for fucking eather will do as long as the guy knows what to do with it.
Would the women who like it cut make it mandatory, or would the women who like it uncut make it forbidden?
Cut and love it that way wouldn't want it any other way at all thanks smile
Quote by Dancing_Doll
Cut. Definitely.

That is a strong preference.
CUT! all the way!!! Love the way the head looks on a cut penis - so yummy!
I'm voting for both. Thank Gawd for variety. I will say this after reading some of the other posts,
I feel sorry for people that make decisions based on hear say and ignorance.
That's true in any situation.
? A True Story ?
I admit to having never seen a cock I didn't like but I have a preference for uncut. It's very exciting for me to hold an uncut cock and slowly slide the foreskin back exposing the head before I take it in my mouth
I'm circumcised and to me that has always been natural. I didn't come into contact with uncut ones until I had nephews and when I saw them I thought they were ugly, shapeless things. I thought mine looked nicer, with the helmet always on show, even when soft. Still do, I suppose, but really it's just a question for the ladies.
Quote by mywife78
Either will do.

But must admit the uncut ones smell a lil more fleshy and the cut ones cleaner...know what I mean?

Either way, once its in its in!

Cut ones seem to have wider heads than uncut...true?


you have nice eyes.
I don't mind either, been with both, as long as they are clean!!!!!