Join the best erotica focused adult social network now
Login

Thunk typos can't cost you? Here's a $100 million oopsie!

last reply
4 replies
2.1k views
0 watchers
0 likes
Matriarch
0 likes
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/headline/biz/4894900.html


Judge says $100 million 'typo' can't be fixed


By MATT APUZZO
Associated Press

WASHINGTON — It was a $100 million mistake, and a federal judge said Friday he doesn't have the power to fix it.

The Justice Department goofed last year and cited the wrong law in a binding plea agreement with telecommunication entrepreneur Walter Anderson, the largest tax scofflaw in U.S. history. That mistake made it impossible for the government to recover between $100 million and $175 million, U.S. District Judge Paul L. Friedman said in March.

Prosecutors urged him to reconsider but Friedman reluctantly said Friday that he could not.

"The court is not free to read something into a contract that is not there or to interpret uncertain language in the government's favor," Friedman said.

Though prosecutors described the error as "a typo" and not "something that the court should be getting wrapped up about," Friedman said his hands were tied.

He said he would have worked around the problem by ordering Anderson to repay the money as part of his probation. But prosecutors omitted any discussion of probation — a common element of plea deals — from Anderson's paperwork.

Friedman sentenced Anderson in March to nine years in prison and ordered him to repay $23 million to the District of Columbia, but ordered no restitution to the federal government.

Prosecutors have promised that the IRS would sue Anderson in civil court to try to recover the money.

Prosecutors have said that Anderson has money stashed away in accounts around the world, a claim he denied in court.
Active Ink Slinger
0 likes
That's damn funny. Sometimes the letter of the law is, well, erm, unjust...
Active Ink Slinger
0 likes
There was an old English grammar example at school i remember...

A suspected murderer was found not guilty and in those days the king had to declare the convict(s) free through a written decree.

The King ordered thus " Hang him not, spare him"

The court writer wrote thus " Hang him, not spare him"

Needless to say, the man was executed.

That's the power of a punctuation.
Matriarch
0 likes
Quote by hornyluc1f3r
There was an old English grammar example at school i remember...

A suspected murderer was found not guilty and in those days the king had to declare the convict(s) free through a written decree.

The King ordered thus " Hang him not, spare him"

The court writer wrote thus " Hang him, not spare him"

Needless to say, the man was executed.

That's the power of a punctuation.


Excellent example of why olde english is no longer in circulation
Lurker
0 likes
Say what they want, anyone that beats the IRS such as that 'scofflaw', deserves what they keep from that particular agency.