Okay everybody, I just have to ask this question. How many words should we use in a sex story before it becomes too long.
I know for myself when reading a sex story. I get bored with long drawn out stories. However when my own stories have a way of taking on a life of their own when I write them. I try and keep them down to around 3500 hundred words or so. I also break my stories into three or four parts all around the same 3500 hundred words or so to complete my story. I try to make all my stories stand alone and are readable without reading the others. But I think I might be over doing it.
So I just have to ask how many words are too many?
BigCarl
I don't think you can have too many if it's well-written.
If it's entertaining, engaging and sexy, it doesn't really matter.
How many words you need to tell a story is, I suppose, dictated by how much story you have to tell. A secondary consideration is what sort of reader you want to attract.
Some readers are looking for nothing (or little) more than a sexual thrill related to whatever their 'thing' is in regard to sexual orientation or practice or fetish. Those readers really don't need much story. Other readers very much prefer complete stories with developed plot and characterization.
I have a real difficulty writing anything under 10K words, but I prefer to write well-developed stories. The reactions I get from readers are very positive, but that is because by now readers know that I write developed stories and tend to gravitate toward them.
My Taking Chances series on smashwords is seven stories ranging in length from a 12K word 'short' story to a 143K word novel. But it simply takes more words to tell a story with characters that are well-rounded and developed with pasts and attitudes and values that guide their actions, a plot that works in the real world, and an interaction of characters and plot that is genuine, both to the real world and to the characters. Another complication is that the seven stories have a continuing plot and characters.
I've never considered myself a writer of 'erotica.' At least, I've never sat down at a keyboard with the intent of writing erotica. I just like to write stories. Those stories tend to explore issues in human sexuality, and I treat that sexuality in a frank and non-euphemized way. Consequently, my stories are only for adults. But I don't really look at them as erotica. They're just stories about characters and plot.
To answer your question directly, I suppose if you prefer less developed and shorter stories then perhaps you should work on writing what you like to read. That seems like the path of least resistance.
I think writers should look at the matter in the same way Mozart did. In the film Amadeus (nobody knows if an exchange similar to this really happened) Holy Roman Emperor Joseph II in critiquing one of Mozart's operas tells him (paraphrasing), "There are just too many notes. Just cut some of them out and the opera will be fine." And Mozart replies (paraphrasing), "But Your Highness, there are only as many notes as it takes to write the opera, no more and no less."
Just use as many words as it takes to tell the story you want to tell at the degree of development you think is right.
Quality over quantity. Simplest answer.
I write stories for my own entertainment and they are always short stories. The two big problems I have to deal with are, 1. The stories tend to be compressed with lot's of erotic episodes and the barest outline to fill in the rest of the story. I'm always interested in getting to my next idea. Normally when a story has run it's course I just delete it and begin another one. I've done this for years. 2. Ending a short story is very difficult to do without sounding like you just ran out of gas. I haven't even come close to figuring that one out. If you want to read a wonderful short story,... "A Field of Blue Flowers" by Tennessee Williams. It's only about 9 pages in a paperback.