How would you prefer to leave a story:
A 'happy for now' conclusion but without revealing what happened to the characters;
Or an epilogue that provides some finality, even if it is not a happy ending?
Just curious.
** Thanks for RejectReality and his superior lexicon for the title change.
It depends upon the story.
As often as not, in this pen name, I leave everything at a HFN ending ( happily for now ) The stories aren't that deep, and are really only vehicles for a sex scene. There's resolution to whatever conflict I established, but I always have at least some little threads that could be pulled on if I choose to write a sequel. Nothing that screams for a follow-up, but enough to entice people to want more.
In deeper stories for my other pen names, ( some of which are here, but we can only have one pen name here ) I tend to wrap everything up in a nice little bow. I wouldn't really say they have epilogues. They simply end with everything resolved, and most often have a HEA ending. ( happily ever after )
I actually do epilogues ( often full chapters ) for my longer fantasy work. Wrap up everything, revisit with characters and places from the story to show how everything turned out. That kind of thing. If I know there's going to be another story coming, or it's a history story leading toward something already written, I typically give at least a mild tease of things to come.
Cliffhangers are for ( in all the various degrees, from mild "so, let's go do this" right up to genuine dangling from your fingertips ) the end of chapters, not the end of stories.
Unless I'm planning to continue a story as a series, I usually wrap things up with a satisfying conclusion without resorting to an epilogue, although I have occasionally used what might be termed an epilogue, when it seemed a better way to finalize the story. I'm not a believer in hard and fast rules when writing.
I tend to leave things where they are without resorting to epilogues. First off, the story generally feels "finished" at that point. Anything further can be left to readers' imaginations. Also, it leaves me open to revisit the story later without being straitjacketed by what I put in the epilogue. I mean, had I ended "April's Secret" with some kind of epilogue, it might have constrained what I could have put in "April's New Friends" and "Christmas in April" when I revisited the characters later (those stories weren't planned at the time I wrote the original) not to mention their cameos in "Wedding Night Blues".
Think it depends. Stories just develop sometimes the ideas continue after I have finished the first story. I have a number of sequels half written but if I don’t feel it helps then they stay half drafted.
It depends on the story. You dig them up and they are what they are.
I have no hard and fast rules on the endings although 50% of the time I tend to leave them open.
"There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance that principle is contempt prior to investigation."
Herbert Spencer