{rant} I don't understand the proclivity of many writers of erotic fiction to have stories begin with the protagonist in some situation that's undefined. The reader doesn't know who the narrator or subject is, doesn't know where they are or how they got there, only that they're being kissed, or hung from the ceiling or have their cock in a vise grip. I think writers who use this "device" feel that it gives an air of mystery and is intriguing. It isn't. It's disorienting and confusing. I think it's just plain sloppy writing, frankly. It may be that a writer overcomes "writer's block" by such a beginning, but then the writer should return and fix the beginning. {/rant}
Occasionally, a device like this works, typically in a noir detective novel in which our hero gets brained at the end of one chapter and wakes up who knows where in the next, but in those circumstances we at least know who he is and that he got coshed.
I frequently stop reading in the first sentence with a beginning like that.
This topic was inspired by a new writer for Lush, puckbunii, whose story, Keep the noise down, had such a beginning. The opening sentence was otherwise brilliant, imo, so I kept reading and I'm glad I did. The story as a whole works very well.
What do others think of anonymous beginnings in unknown space and time?