When you click to rate stories/poems you have a choice of 5 options. Each of the 5 options has a description next to it.
5 - excellent
4 - good
3 - average
2 - fair
1 - poor
Yesterday I voted one poem as fair. Since then I've received several messages suggesting that if I don't like something that I shouldn't read it, or that a score of 2 is mean. Obviously one cannot tell if one likes something without reading it, so that doesn't work, but the implication of what has been said is that if I don't like the quality of writing that I shouldn't vote.
My question...is there any point in having the scoring system including poor and fair, if the expectation is that they're not used.
Second question...if you read something that is below par, do you score and/or comment or do you just ignore it?
Lush culture. I happen to agree with you, Mr Mark. If you look at the way things are set up, most stories should get 3s and 4s here, and 5s should be given out sparingly - the culture here, however, has grown up so that people are actually pissed if you given them 4s. 3s are practically insulting - a lot of readers are now like me - i won't score an a story unless it's truly excellent - it's too much of a pain to give out an honest score -3 IS average, after all, but you hand those out, you get hate mail and revenge scoring. if i'm honest, the scoring system here is broken - it's more of a feel good thing - that said, it's not going to change - it's not something that can be "fixed" - it's just how the site has evolved. we're a lot nicer than most sites who are really brutal - given the choice, i'd rather be nice - if you've ever published a story on a competitors site and actually gotten death threats because they didn't like the subject, you'd understand that statement.
so, in a nutshell, if you're going to be honest, i applaud you - i will also warn you that you're going to get flak for it.
You can’t truly call yourself peaceful unless you are capable of violence. If you’re not capable of violence, you’re not peaceful. You’re harmless.
What the Disney princess said. I've got to the point where if I'm not willing to give a story at least a 4, I just don't bother. It's no longer a scoring system, just a "Like" system and I think I suggested that as a future way to go in another thread on this subject.
Big-haired Bitch/Personality Hire
There have been so many threads started on this subject, but I'll add my two cents anyway.
I'm in total agreement with you Mark, that's the way the scoring system should be used. It would be great to read an OK story, give it a 3 or a 2, and move on. I hate the whole, 'If you didn't like my story, why did you read it?!' mentality. It's like going to a restaurant, taking a bite of something that tastes terrible, and the chef going "If you didn't like my food, why did you eat it?!" You don't know unless you try. I've personally continued reading terrible stories in the hopes that maybe it gets better, or perhaps the overall plot will win me over as opposed to just the story-telling itself.
But as Sprite mentioned, the current Lush culture is to leave good feedback or none at all. And I despise that culture.
I think the reason that has become the culture is because of what you've just experienced. Give someone below a four, and they'll contact you under the guise of 'Tell me what I did wrong as I'd like to improve.' But that's seldom the case. It's really to tell you that you've got it all wrong. And they'll throw numbers at you and whatever else to make their case. Does this apply to all writers? Of course not. But it applies to many. And because of this, people just try to avoid the hassle of giving honest feedback. So if they read a story and think it warrants less than a four, they just won't vote on it because it isn't worth the back and forth with the author, which probably leads to the author blocking you so you can never taint their scores with your honest feedback again.
However, I will say that there's a way to give constructive feedback without being an asshole about it. If your idea of constructive feedback is "Your writing is shitty, fix that shitty shit," then of course you're gonna get a reaction. People put a lot of work into what they do, and they feel strongly about it. So if you're ridiculing someone and their work under the guise of constructive criticism, then you're one of the biggest flaws in the system as you're making authors' reactions to less than perfect feedback justifiable.
░P░U░S░S░Y░ ░I░N░ ░B░I░O░
I agree with everything that has been said by the three posters above. Making friends and getting along with people is part of the Lush culture, and in more than one way this aspect is downright detrimental when it comes to offering/receiving sincere feedback.
When I first joined here, I gave honest scores to stories according to my own impressions. To me, a score of 3 was still 'positive feedback', meaning that it still showed that I appreciated reading that story even though it didn't really correspond to my own preferred style/fantasies. Scores of 4 were reserved for stories of superior quality or for those that hit right in my own fantasies; scores of 5 were much more of a rarity, given only to stories of 'literary' quality.
I soon discovered the 'Lush culture' though, where a score of 4 is considered an utmost insult. And I also experienced quite a bit of jealousy from a few of my friends, from the typical "Why haven't you read my story yet!?" to the whiny "Why have you favorited her story and not mine!?". For a short while that just demotivated me to read stories altogether; it just made me feel like I was some kind of good puppy that was performing a chore.
I don't read as often as some other people here, but nowadays I just give a score of 5 to everything I read. That's just my little sign of approval, as if saying "Yeah, I read your story/poem". Writers still do something creative with their time, which I'm appreciative of and which I think deserves some kind of recognition. For me, offering sugarcoated feedback is still the preferred solution over offering no feedback at all. The only exception to this is when I'm voting on competition entries; then I vote according to my own impressions, to differentiate the good from the not-so-good and to offer the judges something a bit more tangible to work on.
I've only published two pieces so far, but personally I much prefer honest feedback. To me, the number of votes on my stories is much more rewarding than receiving perfect scores of 5. I'd like to know that people took some time to read my work, their opinion of it is only of secondary importance to me.
Fight the power, Mr Mark! Honest scoring and constructive criticism are essential on a site like this. It's the best way for authors to learn, and hone their skills to become better writers.
I've voted below the line many times, even handing out a few 2s and the occasional 1. I've not actually copped an earful over any of it either. I put that down to offering a constructive comment to go along with my score. I stay away from value-laden judgements, and focus on something specific, with a suggestion for how it can be improved. And I always try and soften it with something positive I liked about the story.
But as a mod, I've had to temper that somewhat, lest my feedback be misinterpreted as official site criticism. I've since become a little more generous, leaning more towards supportive than constructive. But I'm finding that's not entirely consistent with my values and integrity. The upshot being I score and comment less these days.
I do agree somewhat with Sprite, as we're all required to under site guidelines, the culture here is positive at all costs. And that's a great environment for timid new writers who are just starting out. Support and encouragement is invaluable. It's also addictive. I think a little more maturity is what's needed. And unlike Sprite, I think you can change a culture.
Keep doing what you're doing, Mark. Hopefully more of us will follow.
My latest story is a racy little piece about what happens when someone cute from work invites you over to watch Netflix and Chill. *Poem removed by moderator. There is a different section of the forum reserved for posting poetry as well as promoting your writing.**
Also, please remember to keep personal disputes out of the forum. Thanks!
I gave up trying to give honest feedback. If I like something I give it a 5 or a 4 if it has a lot of typos or something. it seems many on here have no interest in improving their writing, they only want to be told it's wonderful.
I think there's always going to be votes or comments that one will not like.
Lush fact.
Dare I???
I am a novice new writer here, but I agree the score system is flawed..Seems to me alot of it can be retaliation, jealousy, or simply to knock someone off the top 10 author list hoping they will get on it.
Maybe it's just me but even before I started publishing, I felt that not all stories are to everyones liking but still writing takes time and work...I know that more than ever now and the author should get acknowledged for that. If I dont like a story/poem I wont comment or score it that way no feelings are hurt.
There have been a couple of occasions though that i noted some errors and I wouldnt have dreamed of commenting them publicly, I privately told the person so they could quickly edit. Also another time someone was a bit baffled about why one story hadnt done better and i privately told them why from my pov..though it wouldnt be all that could be and they thanked me but again I kept it private.
LOL recently I published a poem and bless someone emailed me a re version of what I wrote, I thought it was sweet and from their POV they felt the poem would work better how they had worded it..tbh I kinda cringed some of it didnt rhyme...sorry I like my poems to rhyme..but I wasnt offended and was grateful they kept it private. I thanked them and said that I appreciated it but I felt that my version was better suited to my style of writing.
As a novice I appreciate any feedback and advice but I also have feelings, we all do so if the comment is going to be insulting and ridicule me when I have worked hard then that would upset me. I would far prefer a person do as the one did above and offer his/her advice on how I can improve privately and I can choose to either take it or not, we all have different writing styles.
Moving on...Mysteria yes is a friend of mine but so are you Mark, we recently connected over your loss and your miscarriage forum and became friends..in addition to this it was me who first saw your very sad first poem and directed a few friends to go see..wasn't the best poem I ever read tbh but its was full of emotion, Mysteria was one of them that I showed it to.
**Content removed by moderator because personal disputes belong in a private setting. Seriously, send a PM.**
It is a very interesting topic and I would believe a topic that will be discussed as long as Lush lives. Sprite is absolutely correct that Mysteria proved her point. The point of feedback ... to offer a writer some information that would be helpful in future writing. When I joined Lush I made a point to ask for helpful advice. But that just doesn't happen here in the open forum. I gave a writer a '4' on a poem, stating that I was not a big fan of poetry, but liked what he had written. He went ballistic! Called me vile names and couldn't believe I would write such things in my comments. So you learn to just not leave comments, even when you can see that a writer needs some help.
We have people here who write 3rd grade level junk, but have many followers that like that junk. You just have to decide to ignore the junk if you take your writing seriously. Leave comments for those that you know want them ... send private messages to those that may need some help.
If you read one of my stories and want to offer some "help," please feel free to do so. Leave a comment or send me a private message. My goal is to improve as a writer ... if you want to help me, I'd be pleased to have your offering.
I have to agree that displaying who cast a vote on the timeline is a bad idea. It presents a reason to retaliate, causes some people not to vote for fear of retaliation, and causes others to artificially inflate their scores.
I really see no positives to displaying that member name, and lots of negatives.
On another popular erotica site people just vote anonymously. I have some of the same stories I post here and they are scored much lower like around 3.80-4.25. You don't know who is voting for you.
There top lists are broken down by views and by votes. They do it as the top 250 stories of the last 30 days, the last 12 months and of all time.
Lush stories is a place that is more friendly and a much warmer environment. You can really build a fan base here. I like it best here because of the social aspect where you can talk with your readers.
I've scored a grand total of three stories in the past two years - all fives - purely, as seeker4 mentioned, as a "like". The scoring system here is broken but as Trinket says, some people love it despite its obvious flaws.
When you put something up for public consumption you have to put up with the fact that people are often clueless. You will get people giving a low score to a Flash Erotica story because it's "too short". There's also a lot of baffling popular stuff here. Weak, terrible stuff that people can't seem to get enough of. There really is no accounting for taste; scores, views and comments offer no true reflection of writing quality. Poems are even tougher to score with any degree of honesty. How are you meant to vote on someone's anguish? 3/5 could sob harder? No wonder they just rack up the 5s.
Being able to work out who has voted on your story has just made things worse.
My lowest scored stories are the ones I've done for competitions. At first I was deluded and conceited enough to imagine that this was because petty types had voted me down to improve their own story's position in the competition. Now however I'm of the opinion that these stories are the most honestly reviewed stories I've done. That month or so where even your best friends can give you a completely anonymous score allows a much needed variety to scoring - maybe that's the way ahead.
Warning: The opinions above are those of an anonymous individual on the internet. They are opinions, unless they're facts. They may be ill-informed, out of touch with reality or just plain stupid. They may contain traces of irony. If reading these opinions causes you to be become outraged or you start displaying the symptoms of outrage, stop reading them immediately. If symptoms persist, consult a psychiatrist.
Why not read some stories instead
NEW! Want a quick read for your coffee break? Why not try this... Flash Erotica: Scrubber I fully agree you MrMark no point whatsoever in having a voting system if you can not be free to use it.
Mysteria - My comment probably fueled our dispute as all it did was put you down rather than offer constructive feedback. I apologise for that.
I tried to message you about it, but as you blocked me that didn't work.
I stand by what I said about publishing so prolifically..
I think you could be an outstanding writer in terms of quality if you polished each piece more.
I think this YouTube clip illustrates the point well...
My own poem was removed by the lush team as it didn't fit the category of erotic love. It's on storiesspace instead though.
Link not working...I'll try again later from the computer, not my phone.
If you want to see it google Ron Berger butterfly.
Regardless of the conflict that I have caused, I do think there are questions to be asked of the voting system.
Would it be better off simply as a Facebook style "like" as that seems to be what voting means now?