I also feel the need to state that this movie is simply not the masterpiece that many have touted it as. With an 8.0 currently on IMDB this puts Wonder Woman into the same category as the majority of the nominees for Best Picture at last year’s academy awards.
Now, I know what you are thinking right about now…
“Oh here we go. Another anti-PC douche bag who couldn’t get a date for prom so he’s on the internet trashing the closest thing to a female driven superhero movie we’ve ever had!”
No. In fact, I think that anyone gives this movie a 1 out of 10 should probably take a break from watching movies and go sort out their mommy-issues in a way that doesn’t annoy rationally thinking humans. If you think this movie is a 1/10 then you have no idea what a bad movie actually is.
I give it a tentative 7/10, and I feel like that rating is being quite generous. I’m also judging it in relation to other super hero movies and not to Schindler’s List or The Shawshank Redemption. I feel like a rating of 70% puts it in good standing with movies like Thor or Captain America (Both which I feel, Wonder Woman kind of borrowed aspects from).
So what did I like about the movie? (I still have a hard time referring to comic movies as “films”)…
Gal Gadot. They simply could not have chosen a better person for the role. Mark my words, she will be the biggest female movie star in the next few years.
The second act. The “fish out of water” storyline combined with the World War One battle scenes really worked. The combination of naivety and bad-ass ass kicking was the perfect way to show the dichotomy of the character.
I’m also impressed that they managed to take this:
...and make what originally intended to be a pro-USA World War Two propaganda tool and making it somewhat cool.
After all, as a former comic book nerd, I can’t think of anyone that actually ever bought a Wonder Woman comic. If they took something that hasn’t been in vogue for the last 70 years and make it somewhat palatable, then I can give them their dues.
I won’t get into the negatives, because I think the cheesy accents and 80’s style montages should be a dead giveaway.
It’s more than decent, but given the budget, it could have been much better. I think we would all be better off if we could actually just ignore the genitalia of the director and the main star and actually judge the movie on how good it actually is.
Nobody wants a prize for being the “smartest retard in the room.” Let’s judge the end product on how good it is, not on how many glass ceiling’s they are perceived to be breaking. Female directors are just as capable as male directors. Don’t elevate their work simply because they happen to have a vagina.
Have a nice day